(PC) Burruel v. Bonta

Filing 27

ORDER DENYING 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Certificate of Appealability, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 01/19/2023. (Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
Case 1:22-cv-00116-ADA-EPG Document 27 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MANUEL BURRUEL, III, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. Case No. 1:22-cv-00116-ADA-EPG (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (ECF No. 25) ROB BONTA, Defendant. 16 17 18 Manuel Burruel, III (“Plaintiff”), is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis with this action. On January 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the order 20 dismissing his case. (ECF No. 24). On that same day, Plaintiff filed a motion for a certificate of 21 appealability. (ECF No. 25). 22 Plaintiff does not need to request a certificate of appealability in order to file an appeal of 23 the dismissal of this action, which is not a habeas corpus proceeding.1 Plaintiff has filed a notice 24 of appeal (ECF No. 24), and his appeal has been processed to the United States Court of Appeals 25 for the Ninth Circuit (ECF No. 26). 26 27 28 1 “Unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability, an appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from-- (A) the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a State court; or (B) the final order in a proceeding under section 2255.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)-(B). Case 1:22-cv-00116-ADA-EPG Document 27 Filed 01/19/23 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: January 19, 2023 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?