(PC) Burruel v. Bonta
Filing
27
ORDER DENYING 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Certificate of Appealability, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 01/19/2023. (Maldonado, C)
Case 1:22-cv-00116-ADA-EPG Document 27 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MANUEL BURRUEL, III,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
Case No. 1:22-cv-00116-ADA-EPG (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
(ECF No. 25)
ROB BONTA,
Defendant.
16
17
18
Manuel Burruel, III (“Plaintiff”), is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma
19
pauperis with this action. On January 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of the order
20
dismissing his case. (ECF No. 24). On that same day, Plaintiff filed a motion for a certificate of
21
appealability. (ECF No. 25).
22
Plaintiff does not need to request a certificate of appealability in order to file an appeal of
23
the dismissal of this action, which is not a habeas corpus proceeding.1 Plaintiff has filed a notice
24
of appeal (ECF No. 24), and his appeal has been processed to the United States Court of Appeals
25
for the Ninth Circuit (ECF No. 26).
26
27
28
1
“Unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability, an appeal may not be taken to the
court of appeals from-- (A) the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises
out of process issued by a State court; or (B) the final order in a proceeding under section 2255.” 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c)(1)(A)-(B).
Case 1:22-cv-00116-ADA-EPG Document 27 Filed 01/19/23 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a certificate of appealability is
DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated:
January 19, 2023
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?