(PC) Wade v. Cates et al
RESPONSE to 8 Plaintiff's Notice, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/14/2022. (Rivera, O)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RODERICK LYNN WADE,
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
NOTICE (ECF No. 8.)
CATES, et al.,
Roderick Lynn Wade (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint
commencing this action on January 22, 2022. (ECF No. 1.)
On September 6, 2022, Plaintiff notified the Court that one of the defendants named in
his complaint, a Doe defendant (Smart Committee CDCR Contractor), does not appear as a
defendant on the Court’s electronic record.
complaint, only five defendants are named in the Court’s record.
While Plaintiff named six defendants in his
For various reasons, the Court does not always enter every defendant on the caption of
the electronic record. However, all six of the named defendants in his complaint are defendants
in his case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 14, 2022
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?