(PC) Wade v. Cates et al

Filing 9

RESPONSE to 8 Plaintiff's Notice, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 9/14/2022. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RODERICK LYNN WADE, 8 9 10 Plaintiff, 1:22-cv-00123-GSA-PC RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE (ECF No. 8.) vs. CATES, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 Roderick Lynn Wade (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on January 22, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) 16 On September 6, 2022, Plaintiff notified the Court that one of the defendants named in 17 his complaint, a Doe defendant (Smart Committee CDCR Contractor), does not appear as a 18 defendant on the Court’s electronic record. 19 complaint, only five defendants are named in the Court’s record. While Plaintiff named six defendants in his 20 For various reasons, the Court does not always enter every defendant on the caption of 21 the electronic record. However, all six of the named defendants in his complaint are defendants 22 in his case. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 14, 2022 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?