(PC) White v. Unknown

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING 10 Findings and Recommendations in Full; ORDER DISMISSING Case, Without Prejudice, for Failure to Obey Court Order; ORDER for Clerk to CLOSE CASE signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 9/15/2022. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TREYVON DUPREE WHITE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:22-cv-00229-ADA-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL

vs.
(Doc. No. 10.)
UNKNOWN,

15

ORDER DISMISSING CASE, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO OBEY
COURT ORDER

Defendants.

16

(Doc. No. 8.)

17

ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

18
19
20

Plaintiff Treyvon Dupree White (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in this

21

civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

22

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

23

On April 29, 2022, the findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that

24

this case be dismissed, without prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court

25

order. (Doc. No. 10 at 3.) Plaintiff was granted fourteen (14) days to file objections to the

26

//

27

//

28

//
1

1

findings and recommendations. (Id.) The fourteen (14) day period has lapsed, and Plaintiff has

2

not filed objections or any other response to the findings and recommendations.1

3

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B), this court has conducted

4

a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the

5

findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

6

Accordingly,

7

1.

8

The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on April 29,
2020, (Doc. No. 10), are adopted in full;

9

2.

10

This action is dismissed, without prejudice, based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply
with a court order (Doc. No. 8); and

11

3.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

Dated:

September 15, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

On May 10, 2022, the findings and recommendations were returned in the mail to the court by the United
States Postmaster, as undeliverable. A notation on the envelope said: Undeliverable, RTS- Inactive.
Plaintiff has not notified the court of any change in his address. Absent such notice, service at a party’s
prior address is fully effective. Local Rule 182(f).
2