Snow v. Conagra Brands Inc.
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/07/24 CONTINUING the nonexpert discovery cutoff to 06/07/24 and the dispositive motion filing deadline to 06/14/24. (Licea Chavez, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
9
10
11 MICHELLE SNOW,
12
(213) 337-6550
HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP
355 South Grand Ave., Suite 2850, Los Angeles, California 90071
7
13
Case No.:
v.
14
15 CONAGRA BRANDS, INC., and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1:22-CV-00699-KJM-CKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING THE FOURTH JOINT
STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING
ORDER
[Concurrently filed with the Joint Stipulation and
Declaration of Allison Scott]
Complaint Filed:
April 5, 2022
Trial Date:
To be determined
Pursuant to the Fourth Joint Stipulation to Modify the Scheduling Conference Order, IT IS
SO ORDERED:
1. The Court GRANTS the Parties’ Fourth Joint Stipulation to Modify the Scheduling
Conference Order.
2. The Court continues the nonexpert discovery cutoff, and dispositive motion deadline as
follows:
a. Nonexpert discovery cutoff is continued from May 9, 2024 to June 7, 2024
to complete Plaintiff’s deposition related to her notebooks and resolve
28
Case No. 1:22-CV-00699- KJM-CKD
1
ORDER GRANTING FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER
1
outstanding issues related to Plaintiff’s handwritten notes created after
2
2021; and
3
4
5
b. Dispositive motion filing deadline is continued from May 16, 2024 to
June 14, 2024.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 DATED: May 7, 2024.
8
9
10
11
12
(213) 337-6550
HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP
355 South Grand Ave., Suite 2850, Los Angeles, California 90071
7
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 1:22-CV-00699- KJM-CKD
2
ORDER GRANTING FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY
SCHEDULING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?