(SS) Notaro v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR DEFENDAN'S FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/18/2023. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney PETER THOMPSON Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration SHARON LAHEY (CBSN 263027) Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (510) 970-4827 Facsimile (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: sharon.lahey@ssa.com Attorneys for DEFENDANT 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 FRESNO DIVISION 13 14 JOSEPH F. NOTARO, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 vs. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant. 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL NO. 1:22-cv-00745-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEFENDANT’S FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 13) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Joseph F. Notrao (“Plaintiff”) and Kilolo 22 Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and 23 through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 30 days to 24 respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and/or to file any cross-motion. The current 25 deadline is January 19, 2023, and the new deadline will be February 17, 2023. Any reply will be due on 26 27 28 or before March 3, 2023. This is the second extension of time requested in the above-captioned matter of time requested in the above-captioned matter, and it is the first extension of time requested as to Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant requests this additional STIPULATION & ORDER CASE NUMBER 1:22-CV-00745-SKO (SS) 1 2 3 4 5 time because this case is in the process of being transferred interoffice to another attorney who will be responsible for responding to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and requires additional time due to an especially busy caseload, which includes six dispositive motions and one oral argument in the remainder of January of 2023. The Parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. 6 7 Date: January 17, 2023 8 LOTT LAW OFFICES By: /s/ Shellie Lott* SHELLIE LOTT Attorneys for the Plaintiff (*Authorized by email on January 17, 2023) 9 10 11 12 Date: January 17, 2023 13 14 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney By: /s/ Sharon Lahey SHARON LAHEY Special Assistant United States Attorney 15 16 17 ORDER 18 Pursuant to foregoing stipulation (Doc. 13), good cause appearing (see Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), 19 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment 21 and/or to file any cross-motion on or before February 17, 2023. Any reply shall be due on or before 22 23 24 March 3, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 18, 2023 25 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 STIPULATION & ORDER CASE NUMBER 1:22-CV-00745-SKO (SS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & ORDER CASE NUMBER 1:22-CV-00745-SKO (SS)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?