Block v. Kumar et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/16/2022. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HENDRICK BLOCK,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
JIWAN KUMAR individually and dba
DIDIER’S LIQUOR; SANTOSH
KUMAR,

16

Case No. 1:22-cv-01048-BAM
ORDER GRANTING SECOND JOINT
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
(Doc. 9)

Defendants.

17
18

On November 2, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation continuing the deadline for Defendant

19

Jiwan Kumar to file a response to the complaint to November 10, 2022. (Doc. 6.) Currently

20

before the Court is the parties’ second stipulation to continue the deadline for Defendant Jiwan

21

Kumar to respond to the complaint. (Doc. 9.) The parties request that the deadline be continued

22

to November 28, 2022.1 The parties explain that additional time is necessary because Defendant

23

Jiwan Kumar recently retained counsel. (Id. at 2.) This is the same reason previously identified

24

by the parties for the initial extension of time.
Having considered the second stipulation, and cause appearing, the parties’ request to

25
26

extend the deadline for Defendant Jiwan Kumar to respond to the complaint is GRANTED.

27
1

28

The parties indicate that the deadline to respond was October 31, 2022. (Doc. 9.) However, the parties
previously extended the time to November 10, 2022. (Doc. 6.)

1

1

Defendant Jiwan Kumar shall file a response to the complaint on or before November 28, 2022.

2

No further extensions of time shall be granted absent a demonstrated showing of good cause. The

3

Scheduling Conference remains as calendared for January 26, 2023.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

November 16, 2022

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2