(PC) Singh v. Pheiffer, et al.
ORDER for Clerk to Randomly Assign United States District Judge to this Case; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending that 4 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be Denied re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/17/2022. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Rivera, O)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL MANJEET SINGH,
ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY
ASSIGN UNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGE TO THIS CASE
PHEIFFER, ET AL.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS BE DENIED
(ECF No. 4.)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS
Michael Manjeet Singh (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 9, 2022, Plaintiff filed the Complaint
commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On November 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to
proceed in forma pauperis along with a certified copy of his prison trust account, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 4.)
Plaintiff’s trust account statement shows that on November 4, 2022, he had a balance of
$15,947.50. (Id.) Under these facts the court finds that Plaintiff can afford the $402.00 filing
fee for this action. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied,
and Plaintiff should be required to pay the statutory filing fee of $400.00 for this action in full.
ORDER, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND CONCLUSION
The Clerk is hereby directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
Recommendations and Conclusion
Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, filed on November 14, 2022, be
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
(14) days after the date of service of these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file
written objections with the court.
Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
Plaintiff be required to pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action in full.
Such a document should be captioned “Objections to
IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 17, 2022
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?