United States of America v. Desenberg

Filing 12

STIPULATED FINAL ORDER of Garnishment, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/17/2023. TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc. is directed to pay the Clerk of the United States District Court all the funds held by Garnishee within fifteen (1 5) days of the filing of this Final Order of Garnishment. Payment shall be made in the form of a cashier's check, money order, or company draft, made payable to the "Clerk of the Court." The criminal docket number (1:11-cr-00406-LJO-SKO) shall be stated on the payment instrument. The garnishment shall terminate, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case, when the payment is deposited with the Clerk. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
Case 1:22-mc-00012-BAM Document 12 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 4 1 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 2 LYNN TRINKA ERNCE Assistant United States Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 6 Attorneys for the United States of America 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 12 Case No. 1:22-MC-00012-BAM [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT v. 13 Criminal Case No. 1:11-CR-00406-LJO-SKO 14 JOHN MARCUS DESENBERG, 15 Defendant and Debtor. 16 17 TD AMERITRADE CLEARING, INC., 18 Garnishee. 19 20 The United States of America (“United States”) and defendant/judgment debtor John Marcus 21 22 Desenberg (“Debtor”) hereby request that the Court enter this Stipulated Final Order of Garnishment 23 based on the following: RECITALS 24 1. 25 On or about April 8, 2013, the Court sentenced Debtor in criminal case 1:11-CR-00406 26 LJO SKO, and ordered him to pay a $200 statutory assessment and $300,000 of restitution. As of 27 January 12, 2023, debtor still owes restitution of $214,195.68. 28 /// 30 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT 1 Case 1:22-mc-00012-BAM Document 12 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 4 1 2. On January 20, 2022, the United States filed an Application for Writ of Garnishment 2 against Debtor’s interest in property held by TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc. (“Garnishee”). ECF 1. 3 3. The Clerk of the Court issued the Writ and Clerk’s Notice to Debtor. ECF 3 and ECF 2. 4 The United States served the Writ and related documents on Garnishee and Debtor. ECF 4 and 6. 5 4. On January 24, 2022, Garnishee served its Acknowledgment of Service and Answer of 6 Garnishee on Debtor and the United States (“Answer”). ECF 5. In its Answer, Garnishee stated that it 7 has possession of an individual brokerage account ending in 9195 with an approximate total value of 8 $152.34, which is subject to market fluctuations and deposits. Id. As of November 30, 2022, the 9 account held $802.44. 10 5. Debtor did not file a claim of exemption to the proposed garnishment or request a 11 hearing, did not object to Garnishee’s Answer, and did not otherwise object to the United States’ 12 garnishment action. STIPULATION 13 14 The United States and Debtor hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 15 A. The United States and Debtor consent to entry of an order approving this Stipulation by a 16 magistrate judge, and consent forms so stating are concurrently filed with this Stipulation. 17 B. Debtor acknowledges and understands that the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act 18 (“FDCPA”) affords him certain rights in a garnishment action. He waives these rights, including service 19 of the writ of garnishment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(3); notice of and the right to claim 20 exemptions and request a hearing as provided in 28 U.S.C. §§ 3202 and 3205(c)(5); and to any other 21 process to which he may be entitled under the FDCPA. 22 [TEXT AND SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE] 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT 2 Case 1:22-mc-00012-BAM Document 12 Filed 01/17/23 Page 3 of 4 C. 1 The Court should grant the Writ of Garnishment against the TD Ameritrade account 2 ending in 9195, and Garnishee should disburse all funds held in the account ending in 9195 to the Clerk 3 of Court to be applied towards Debtor’s restitution obligation by approving the proposed Order set forth 4 below. Respectfully submitted, 5 6 Dated: _01/13/2023______________ PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 7 8 By: /s/ Lynn Trinka Ernce LYNN TRINKA ERNCE Assistant United States Attorney 9 10 11 Dated: 01/13/2023 /s/ John Marcus Desenberg JOHN MARCUS DESENBERG 12 13 *** 14 [PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT 15 Based on the foregoing stipulation between the United States of America and John Marcus 16 Desenberg, and good cause appearing therefore, 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 18 1. The foregoing Stipulation is APPROVED in its entirety, and the parties’ request for a 19 final order of garnishment IS GRANTED; 20 2. TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc. is directed to pay the Clerk of the United States District 21 Court all the funds held by Garnishee within fifteen (15) days of the filing of this Final Order of 22 Garnishment. Payment shall be made in the form of a cashier’s check, money order, or company draft, 23 made payable to the “Clerk of the Court,” and delivered to: 24 Office of the Clerk of Court U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California 501 I St., Rm. 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 25 26 27 The criminal docket number (1:11-cr-00406-LJO-SKO) shall be stated on the payment instrument; 28 /// 30 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT 3 Case 1:22-mc-00012-BAM Document 12 Filed 01/17/23 Page 4 of 4 1 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve matters through ancillary proceedings in the 2 case, if necessary; and 3 4. The garnishment shall terminate, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case, 4 when the payment is deposited with the Clerk. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara January 17, 2023 _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 A. McAuliffe [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?