USA v. Approx. $25,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Filing
6
STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Time for Filing a Complaint for Forfeiture and/or to Obtain an Indictment Alleging Forfeiture signed by District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/29/2022. (Sant Agata, S)
4
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U. S. Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
5
Attorneys for the United States
1
2
3
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
CASE NO. 1:22-MC-00035-JLT
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME
FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE
AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT
ALLEGING FORFEITURE
APPROXIMATELY $25,000.00 IN
U.S. CURRENCY,
15
Defendant.
16
17
It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and potential claimant Jesus
18 Pedro Maldonado Ceja (“claimant”), by and through their respective counsel, as follows:
19
1.
On or about December 1, 2021, claimant Maldonado Ceja filed a claim in the
20 administrative forfeiture proceedings with the Federal Bureau of Investigation with respect to the
21 Approximately $25,000.00 in U.S. Currency (hereafter “defendant currency”), which was seized on
22 September 2, 2021.
23
2.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit required
24 by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any person to file a
25 claim to the defendant currency under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than the
26 claimant has filed a claim to the defendant currency as required by law in the administrative forfeiture
27 proceeding.
28 ///
29
30
1
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
1
3.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for
2 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant
3 currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative
4 forfeiture proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the
5 parties. That deadline was March 1, 2022.
6
4.
By Stipulation and Order filed March 4, 2022, the parties stipulated to extend to May 2,
7 2022, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the
8 defendant property and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant property is subject to
9 forfeiture.
10
5.
By Stipulation and Order filed April 26, 2022, the parties stipulated to extend to July 31,
11 2022, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the
12 defendant property and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant property is subject to
13 forfeiture.
14
6.
As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further extend
15 to September 29, 2022, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for
16 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant
17 currency is subject to forfeiture.
18
7.
Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be
19 required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment
20 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to September 29, 2022.
21 Dated: July 29, 2022
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
22
23
24
/s/ Kevin C. Khasigian
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney
25
26 Dated: July 28, 2022
27
28
29
30
/s/ Robert L. Forkner
ROBERT L. FORKNER
Attorney for potential claimant
Jesus Pedro Maldonado Ceja
(As approved by email on 7/28/22)
2
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
1
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 29, 2022
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?