Primavera v. The Bank of Missouri et al
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on November 13, 2023, as follows: 1. By no later than November 20, 2023, Defendant Bank of Missouri shall file a signed document reflecting its approval of the stipulation of dismissal (ECF No. [32 ]) or file a response opposing the stipulation of dismissal. 2. Alternatively, by no later than November 20, 2023, the parties may file a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in this action in compliance with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).(Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CYNTHIA PRIMAVERA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
Case No. 1:23-cv-00233-ADA-EPG
ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES, LLC ONLY
THE BANK OF MISSOURI, et al.,
(ECF No. 32)
Defendants.
15
16
17
On November 8, 2023, Plaintiff Cynthia Primavera and Defendant Equifax Information
18
19
20
Services, LLC (Equifax) filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice of the claims against
Equifax under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own
costs and attorney fees. (ECF No. 32). However, because Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) requires a
21
stipulation of dismissal to be “signed by all parties who have appeared,” and only Plaintiff and
22
Equifax have signed the stipulation, the Court will require the remaining Defendant in the case
23
who has appeared—The Bank of Missouri—to submit a filing approving or opposing the
24
stipulation of dismissal. See Thacker v. AT&T Corp., No. 2:20-CV-00255-KJM-CKD PS, 2021
25
WL 1784873, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 5, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, 2021 WL
26
4168533 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2021) (noting that court was “unaware of any case waiving the
27
requirement that the stipulation . . . must be made by all parties who have appeared” and that
28
“[t]he requirement to obtain all parties’ consent to voluntarily dismiss (without a court order) is
1
1
intended to ensure that a voluntary dismissal of a party at later stages of the litigation does not
2
cause plain legal prejudice to the party to be dismissed or to the remaining defendant(s)”).
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. By no later than November 20, 2023, Defendant Bank of Missouri shall file a signed
document reflecting its approval of the stipulation of dismissal (ECF No. 32) or file a
response opposing the stipulation of dismissal.
2. Alternatively, by no later than November 20, 2023, the parties may file a stipulation of
dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in this action in compliance with Rule
41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:
November 13, 2023
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?