(PC) Stith et al v. State of California, et al.

Filing 23

ORDER VACATING Findings and Recommendations 16 signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/5/2024. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLENE STITH,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:23-cv-0947 KES GSA (PC)
ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

v.
(ECF No. 16)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On August 28, 2023, the Court issued an order which recommended that this case be

17
18

dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with its order to file a new completed application to

19

proceed in forma pauperis or – in the alternative – to pay the filing fee in full. See ECF Nos. 13,

20

16 (order regarding new in forma pauperis application; findings and recommendations regarding

21

same).

22

Since then, Plaintiff has submitted a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis

23

(ECF No. 17), and the application has been granted (ECF No. 18). Therefore, the Court’s

24

pending findings and recommendations order issued August 28, 2023 (ECF No. 16), will be

25

vacated.

26
27

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the outstanding findings and
recommendations order issued August 28, 2023 (ECF No. 16), is VACATED.

28
1

1
2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 5, 2024

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2