Yaqub v. Paynter. et al.

Filing 24

ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCEDURES AND SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE for March 19, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/6/2024. (Navarro, F)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RAHAT YAQUB, No. 1:23-CV-01482 NODJ EPG 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PROCEDURES JACOB PAYNTER, ET AL., Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court sets a settlement conference for March 19, 2024, at 1:00 p.m., Courtroom 10, before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The conference will be held remotely by Zoom. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall appear (via Zoom) at the Settlement Conference. It is recommended that pertinent evidence to be offered at trial, documents or otherwise, be submitted with the settlement conference brief for presentation to the settlement judge. Neither the settlement conference statements nor communications during the settlement conference with the settlement judge can be used by either party in the trial of this case. Absent permission from the Court, in addition to counsel who will try the case being present (via Zoom), the individual parties shall also be present (via Zoom). In the case of corporate parties, associations or other entities, and insurance carriers, a representative executive with authority to discuss, consider, propose and agree, or disagree, to any settlement proposal or offer shall also be present (via Zoom). 1 1 Parties are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present (via Zoom) 2 at the Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. The 3 individual with full authority to settle must also have "unfettered discretion and authority" to 4 change the settlement position of the party, if appropriate. The purpose behind requiring the 5 attendance of a person with full settlement authority is that the parties' view of the case may be 6 altered during the face to face conference. An authorization to settle for a limited dollar amount or 7 sum certain can be found not to comply with the requirement of full authority to settle. 8 IF ANY PARTY BELIEVES THAT A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD 9 BE FUTILE, THEN THAT PARTY SHALL CONTACT THE COURT NOT LATER 10 THAN SEVENTY-TWO HOURS PRECEDING THE SCHEDULED SETTLEMENT 11 CONFERENCE. 12 Confidential Settlement Statements 13 At least five (5) court days prior to the settlement conference, each party shall submit a 14 Confidential Settlement Conference Statement in Word format directly to Judge Grosjean’s 15 Chambers at epgorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The statement shall not be filed on the docket or 16 served on any other party. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date 17 and time of the settlement conference clearly noted on the first page. The Confidential Settlement 18 Conference Statement shall include the following: 19 A. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 20 B. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds 21 upon which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' 22 likelihood of prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major 23 issues in dispute. 24 C. A summary of the proceedings to date. 25 D. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial 26 and trial. 27 E. The relief sought. 28 F. The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a 2 1 2 history of past settlement discussions, offers and demands. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 Dated: February 6, 2024 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?