(HC) Clark v. Warden, FCI Mendota

Filing 10

ORDER Directing Respondent to File Response to Petition and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/4/2024. Response to Petition and Show Cause Response due within seven (7) days. (Lawrence, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RUSSEL BRUCE CLARK,
Petitioner,

12

ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO
FILE RESPONSE TO PETITION

v.

13
14

Case No. 1:24-cv-00211-SAB-HC

WARDEN, FCI MENDOTA,

15

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

Respondent.

16
17

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
19

On February 27, 2024, the Court ordered Respondent to file a response to the petition.

20 (ECF No. 5.) On April 30, 2024, the Court granted Respondent until May 29, 2024, to file a
21 response. (ECF No. 9.) To date, Respondent has failed to file a response to the petition.
22

Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these

23 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all
24 sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” L.R. 110.
25
26
27
28 ///

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Within seven (7) days of the date of service of this order, Respondent shall file a response
to the petition; and

1

2. Within seven (7) days of the date of service of this order, Respondent shall show cause
why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with this Court’s orders.

2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 Dated:

June 4, 2024
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2