Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Stockwoodco, Inc. et al
Filing
30
ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS STOCKWOODCO, INC. AND NAT STOCK (ECF No. 29 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/29/2025. IT IS ORDERED as follows: The February 21, 2025 hearing d ate is vacated. By no later than February 5, 2025, counsel shall serve a copy of this order on Defendants and file proof of service on the docket. By no later than February 5, 2025, counsel shall file a supplement in support of the motion to withdraw that (1) sets a properly noticed hearing and includes a declaration (or affidavit) (2) providing an address for each Defendant and (3) specifying the efforts made to let each Defendant know about the motion to withdraw (including the noticed hearing date). (Deputy Clerk CLA)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
OHIO SECURITY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:24-cv-00279-KES-EPG
v.
STOCKWOODCO, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENT IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS
STOCKWOODCO, INC. AND NAT STOCK
(ECF No. 29)
16
17
Plaintiff Ohio Security Insurance Company seeks a declaratory judgment that it owes no
18
duty to defend or indemnify Nat Stock (the president and sole owner of Stockwoodco, Inc.) or
19
Stockwoodco, Inc. (collectively, the relevant Defendants for purposes of this order) in a pending
20
state court case. (ECF No. 1, p. 1). Before the assigned District Judge, there is a pending motion
21
22
23
24
for judgment on the pleadings filed by Plaintiff that Defendants have opposed. (ECF Nos. 23, 26).
This matter is now before the Court on the motion of Defendants’ attorneys—Jay
Christofferson and Nathan Martin to withdraw—to withdraw as counsel, generally because
Defendants have allegedly failed to pay their attorney fees and communicate with counsel. (ECF
No. 26). The motion is set for a hearing on February 21, 2025, before the undersigned. Upon
25
review, the Court will vacate the hearing and require a supplement in support of the motion.
26
27
As an initial matter, the motion to withdraw was noticed for an improper date. Under
Local Rule 230(b), a “matter shall be set for hearing on the motion calendar of the Judge or
28
1
1
Magistrate Judge to whom the action has been assigned or before whom the motion is to be heard
2
not less than thirty-five (35) days after service and filing of the motion.” Here, the hearing was
3
noticed for a date about three weeks from the filing of the motion. Thus, the hearing date will be
4
vacated, with counsel directed to notice a new hearing date in a supplement to the motion.
5
Next, Local Rule 182(d) governs withdraw of counsel in these circumstances:
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Unless otherwise provided herein, an attorney who has appeared may not
withdraw leaving the client in propria persona without leave of court upon noticed
motion and notice to the client and all other parties who have appeared. The
attorney shall provide an affidavit stating the current or last known address
or addresses of the client and the efforts made to notify the client of the
motion to withdraw. Withdrawal as attorney is governed by the Rules of
Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California, and the attorney shall conform
to the requirements of those Rules. The authority and duty of the attorney of record
shall continue until relieved by order of the Court issued hereunder. Leave to
withdraw may be granted subject to such appropriate conditions as the Court
deems fit.
E.D. Cal. LR 182(d) (emphasis added).
13
Here, Attorney Christofferson has provided a declaration stating that “I am aware that Nat
14
Stock’s current or last known address is P.O. Box 446, Auberry, CA 93602; Phone No.: 323-314-
15
7100; and E-mail: stockwoodco@gmail.com.” (ECF No. 29-1). Presumably, this is also the
16
proper address for Stockwoodco, Inc., but counsel should clarify this in a declaration provided
17
with the supplement.
18
While the declaration and motion generally indicate that counsel has tried to communicate
19
with Defendants and has warned them of possible withdrawal, there is nothing in the declaration
20
addressing the efforts made to notify Defendants of the motion to withdraw itself. Accordingly,
21
counsel shall address this in a declaration filed with the supplement.
22
23
24
25
26
Additionally, the Court will direct counsel to serve a copy of this order on Defendants,
and Defendants are advised that, if the motion to withdraw is ultimately heard and granted, “[a]
corporation must be represented by counsel,” and they should be prepared to address whether
they intend to obtain new counsel. Reading Int'l, Inc. v. Malulani Grp., Ltd., 814 F.3d 1046, 1053
(9th Cir. 2016).
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
27
1. The February 21, 2025 hearing date is vacated.
28
2
1
2. By no later than February 5, 2025, counsel shall serve a copy of this order on Defendants
and file proof of service on the docket.
2
3. By no later than February 5, 2025, counsel shall file a supplement in support of the motion
3
4
to withdraw that (1) sets a properly noticed hearing and includes a declaration (or
5
affidavit) (2) providing an address for each Defendant and (3) specifying the efforts made
to let each Defendant know about the motion to withdraw (including the noticed hearing
6
date).
7
4. The Court will permit telephonic appearances at the to-be-noticed hearing, with the parties
8
to use the following new dial-in information: To connect to the telephonic conference, the
9
parties shall (1) dial 1-669-254-5252, (2) enter 161 733 0675 for the meeting ID followed
10
by #, (3) enter # when asked for the participant ID, (4) enter 740484 for the meeting
11
passcode followed #, and (5) enter *6 to unmute.
12
5. Defendants Nat Stock and Stockwoodco, Inc.1 are required to attend the to-be-noticed
13
hearing, and if they fail to do so, they are advised that the motion to withdraw may be
14
granted without giving them a further opportunity to respond to the motion.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated:
January 29, 2025
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Stockwoodco, Inc. can appear through an appropriate representative of the company.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?