Navarro et al v. Walmart, Inc.

Filing 46

ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 03/18/2025. Pursuant to the March 17, 2025 stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 45 ), and finding good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file its motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' first amended consolidated complaint no later than April 28, 2025. Plaintiffs shall file their response to Defendant's motion to dismiss no later than May 28, 2025. Defendant shall file its reply, if any, by June 18, 2025. (Deputy Clerk JN)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 GRACE NAVARRO, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00288-JLT-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 14 WALMART, INC., (ECF No. 45) 15 Defendant. 16 17 On March 13, 2025, Plaintiffs filed their first amended consolidated complaint. (ECF 18 No. 43.) Defendant’s responsive pleading is currently due on March 27, 2025. On March 17, 19 2025, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for Defendant to file a motion to 20 dismiss and a request for a modified briefing schedule. (ECF No. 45.) 21 Pursuant to the March 17, 2025 stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 45), and finding good 22 cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. complaint no later than April 28, 2025; 24 25 26 27 / / / 28 / / / Defendant shall file its motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended consolidated 2. Plaintiffs shall file their response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss no later than May 28, 2025; and 3. 1 Defendant shall file its reply, if any, by June 18, 2025. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: March 18, 2025 STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?