(SS) Esquivel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 3

ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/27/2024. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEXANDRA KATHERINE ESQUIVEL, Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ISSUE SUMMONS AND SERVE DEFENDANT UNDER E-SERVICE PROGRAM v. 13 14 Case No. 1:24-cv-00353-SAB COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 2) 16 17 Plaintiff Alexandra Katherine Esquivel filed a complaint on March 26, 2024, challenging 18 a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying an application for disability 19 benefits. Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to 20 proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) 21 The Court finds Plaintiff’s application demonstrates entitlement to proceed without 22 prepayment of fees. Therefore, the Court shall order that the complaint in this action be served, 23 pursuant to paragraph 1 of the scheduling order to be issued in this action, which provides that 24 service on the Defendant shall proceed under the Court’s e-service program. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED; 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue a summons and new case documents; and 4 3. 5 The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to deliver to the Commissioner of Social 6 Security Administration and the United States Attorney’s Office at their 7 designated email addresses, a notice of electronic filing of this action along with 8 the summons and complaint. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: March 27, 2024 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?