(HC) Flores v. The People

Filing 6

ORDER DENYING 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/7/2024. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOAQUIN FLORES, 12 Case No. 1:24-cv-00444-SKO (HC) Petitioner, 13 v. 14 THE PEOPLE, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL [Doc. 5] 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute 17 18 right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 19 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title 20 18 U.S.C. ยง 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if "the 21 interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the 22 present case, the Court does not find that the interests of justice require the appointment of 23 counsel at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for appointment of 24 25 counsel is DENIED. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 Dated: /s/ Sheila K. Oberto May 7, 2024 1 . 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?