Hudson vs Citibank, N.A.

Filing 11

ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CITIBANK, N.A.'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF BRADLEY HUDSON'S COMPLAINT. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/9/2024. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
1 4 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP Jasdeep S. Atwal, California Bar No. 318309 120 Broadway, Suite 300 Santa Monica, California 90401-2386 Telephone: (310) 576-2100 Facsimile: (310) 576-2200 E-Mail: jasdeep.atwal@bclplaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A. 2 3 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP 120 BROADWAY, SUITE 300 SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401-2386 10 BRADLEY HUDSON, an individual, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT CITIBANK, N.A.’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF BRADLEY HUDSON’S COMPLAINT Defendant. Hon. Sheila K. Oberto 15 Action Filed: April 16, 2024 Trial Date: Not set. 16 17 Case No. 1:24-CV-00452-SKO Plaintiff BRADLEY HUDSON (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant CITIBANK, N.A. 18 (“Citibank”) (together, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate to and request an order extending 19 Citibank’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure 6 and Local Rule 144(a): 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, on April 16, 2024, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in the above-entitled matter; WHEREAS, on June 12, 2024, counsel for the Parties stipulated to extend Citibank’s response deadline by to July 8, 2024; WHEREAS, on June 13, 2024 this Court issued an order extending Citibank’s deadline to respond to the Complaint to July 8, 2024; WHEREAS, the complaint and subsequent motion to dismiss filed in The People of the State of New York v. Citibank, N.A., filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as case no. 1:24-cv-00659 (the “SDNY Action”), involve allegations and arguments similar to those asserted/likely to be asserted in this action, and the resolution of the pending motion to dismiss may influence the resolution of this action; ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 likely to be decided in early-to-mid July; WHEREAS, the motion to dismiss in the SDNY Action is still pending; WHEREAS, Citibank is informed and believes that the parties entered into an enforceable arbitration agreement embracing Plaintiff’s claims and is in the process of locating the arbitration agreement; WHEREAS, the parties agree that a further three-week extension of Citibank’s response deadline will therefore promote judicial economy; 8 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 9 Citibank’s deadline to respond to the Complaint shall be extended until July 29, 2024. 10 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP 120 BROADWAY, SUITE 300 SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401-2386 WHEREAS, the parties believed that the motion to dismiss in the SDNY Action was 11 This Stipulation is made without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights or defenses otherwise available in this action. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 13 Dated: July 8, 2024 LAW OFFICES OF MELINDA J. STEUER /s/ Melinda J. Steuer Melinda J. Steuer Attorneys for Plaintiff Bradley Hudson Dated: July 8, 2024 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP /s/ Jasdeep S. Atwal Jasdeep S. Atwal Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 1 ORDER 2 Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation and Request for Order to Extend Defendant 3 Citibank, N.A.’s (“Citibank”) Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff Bradley Hudson’s (“Plaintiff”) 4 Complaint (the “Joint Stipulation”) (Doc. 10), and finding good cause therefor, the Court grants 5 the relief requested in the Joint Stipulation and hereby orders that Citibank’s deadline to respond to 6 Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be July 29, 2024. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP 120 BROADWAY, SUITE 300 SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401-2386 10 Dated: /s/ Sheila K. Oberto July 9, 2024 . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?