Cordova v. Rodriguez, et al.

Filing 6

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE NOTICE WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/13/2024. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing no later than May 20, 2024, why sanctions should not issue for failure to file a notice of related cases or a notice explaining why the action should not be related by the deadline as required by the Court's order (ECF No. #5 ). Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. (Nguyen, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ZENAIDA CORDOVA,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
GREG RODRIGUEZ, et al.,
Defendants.

16

Case No. 1:24-cv-00482-JLT-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE
NOTICE WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE
RELATED
(ECF No. 5)
DEADLINE: MAY 20, 2024

17
18

On April 23, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this action against Defendants Greg

19

Rodriguez and Michael Pallares. (ECF No. 1.) The Court’s review of the complaint suggests that

20

this case may be related to other actions pending in this district. On April 26, 2024, the Court

21

issued an order requiring Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 123 and file a notice of related cases

22

or, alternatively, a notice explaining why the action should not be related no later than May 10,

23

2024. (ECF No. 5.) The deadline has now expired, and Plaintiff has not filed the required notice

24

nor requested an extension of time to do so.

25

Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules

26

or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all

27

sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to

28

control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate,
1

1

including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir.

2

2000). The Court shall require Plaintiff to show cause why sanctions should not issue for the

3

failure to notify the Court whether this case should be related in compliance with the Court’s

4

order issued April 26, 2024.

5

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

6

1.

Plaintiff shall show cause in writing no later than May 20, 2024, why sanctions

7

should not issue for failure to file a notice of related cases or a notice explaining

8

why the action should not be related by the deadline as required by the Court’s

9

order (ECF No. 5); and

10

2.

Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions.

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 13, 2024
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2