Soto v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc., et al.
Filing
5
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE PENDING THE COURT'S RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/8/2024. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JOHN SOTO, an individual and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
vs.
Case No.: 1:24-cv-00520-SKO
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S
RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
PENDING THE COURT’S RULING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., a
New York corporation; ERNESTO ACOSTA,
an individual; and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
PENDING THE COURT’S RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND
1
Having considered the parties’ stipulation to vacate Defendant Graybar Electric Company,
2
Inc.’s responsive pleading deadline pending the Court’s ruling on Plaintiff John Soto’s anticipated
3
motion for remand, and upon good cause shown,
4
THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
5
1.
The deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint is STAYED;
6
2.
Plaintiff shall file his motion for remand by May 31, 2024; and
7
3.
Should the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for remand, within 14 days of issuing
8
such an order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint or, if no amended complaint is filed,
9
Defendant shall have 28 days from the issuance of such order to file a responsive pleading to the
10
original complaint.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Dated:
14
May 8, 2024
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
PENDING THE COURT’S RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?