Conrriquez v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Filing 20

ORDER RE: Stipulation for Dismissal of Action with prejudice and directing the Clerk of Court to close the case 19 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/23/2024. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

MONICA CONRRIQUEZ,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

Case No. 1:24-cv-00575-EPG
ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR
DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE THE CASE

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
(ECF No. 19).

14

Defendant.

15
16

On December 20, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing this action with

17

prejudice.1 (ECF No. 19). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, Fed.

18

R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to the parties’

19

stipulation, “the Court [will] continue to retain jurisdiction over the terms of the [p]arties’

20

settlement agreement.” (Id. at 2).
Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate any and all pending dates,

21
22

deadlines, and motions and to thereafter close this case.

23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated:

25

December 23, 2024

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
1

28

What appears to be an identical document, though labeled (likely mistakenly) as a motion to dismiss, was
also filed on December 20, 2024. (ECF No. 18).

1