Young, et al. v. Keystone RV Company

Filing 8

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS BY COURT ORDERED DEADLINE, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/22/2024. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties s hall show cause in writing no later than November 27, 2024, why sanctions should not issue for the failure to file dispositional documents by the deadline required by the October 31, 2024, order (ECF No. 7 ). The parties are advised tha t filing dispositional documents without also filing documents showing cause in writing why sanctions should not issue does not constitute compliance with this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. (Nguyen, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SCOTT YOUNG, et al.,

12
13

Plaintiffs,
v.

14

KEYSTONE RV COMPANY,

15

Defendant.

16

Case No. 1:24-cv-00608-KES-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW
CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS
SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO FILE
DISPOSITIONAL DOCUMENTS BY COURT
ORDERED DEADLINE
(ECF No. 7)
DEADLINE: NOVEMBER 27, 2024

17
18

On October 31, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement of this action. (ECF No. 6.) On

19

October 31, 2024, the Court issued an order setting the deadline to file dispositional documents

20

within twenty-one days, or by November 21, 2024.

21

dispositional documents has now expired and the parties have not done so, nor requested an

22

extension of time from the Court.

(ECF No. 7.)

The deadline to file

23

Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules

24

or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all

25

sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to

26

control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate,

27

including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir.

28

2000). The Court shall require the parties to show cause why sanctions should not issue for the
1

1

failure to file dispositional documents in compliance with the Court’s order issued October 31,

2

2024.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

4

1.

The parties shall show cause in writing no later than November 27, 2024, why

5

sanctions should not issue for the failure to file dispositional documents by the

6

deadline required by the October 31, 2024, order (ECF No. 7). The parties are

7

advised that filing dispositional documents without also filing documents

8

showing cause in writing why sanctions should not issue does not constitute

9

compliance with this order; and

10

2.

Failure to comply with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions.

11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 22, 2024
STANLEY A. BOONE
United States Magistrate Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2