Swetala v. Quten Research Institute, LLC

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING 28 Motion of Withdrawal of Counsel Lilach Halperin as Attorney of Record for Plaintiff, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/27/2024. Attorney Lilach Halperin terminated. (Rivera, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 ANTHONY SWETALA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 v. QUTEN RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LLC, Case No. 1:24-cv-00620-JLT-BAM ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL LILACH HALPERIN AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF (Doc. 28) Defendant. 13 14 15 Currently before the Court is the motion of Lilach Halperin of the Law Offices of Ronald 16 A. Marron to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff in this action. (Doc. 28.) Although 17 styled as a motion to withdraw as counsel, the document is effectively a notice of withdrawal and 18 Plaintiff notes that he will continue to be represented by attorneys of record Ronald A. Marron, 19 Kas L. Gallucci, and Alexis M. Wood from the Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron. (Id.) A 20 motion to withdraw is not required as plaintiffs will continue to be represented by counsel of 21 record, the Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron. See Local Rule 182(d); Doc. 28. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 Accordingly, for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney Lilach 2 Halperin of the Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron is withdrawn as counsel of record for Plaintiff 3 in this case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate attorneys Lilach Halperin of the Law 4 Offices of Ronald A. Marron as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara August 27, 2024 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?