L.V.Q. v. The GEO Group, Inc.

Filing 6

ORDER GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym and for Protective Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 6/5/2024. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14

Case No. 1:24-cv-00656-KES-CDB

L.V.Q.,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER
PSEUDONYM AND FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER

THE GEO GROUP, INC.,
(Doc. 16)

15

Defendant.

16
17
18

On June 3, 2024, Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of a complaint against Defendant

19

The GEO Group, Inc. (“Defendant”). (Doc. 1). That same day, Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion to

20

proceed under pseudonym and for protective order. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff requests to proceed by the

21

pseudonym “L.V.Q.” in place of his true and correct name. Id. Further, Plaintiff asks the Court for a

22

protective order that requires the parties to redact or otherwise withhold all personally identifying

23

information, including Plaintiff’s true full name, from all public filings, consistent with Federal Rule

24

of Civil Procedure 5.2. Id. For the reasons below, Plaintiff’s ex parte motion is GRANTED, subject

25

to reconsideration following Defendant’s appearance in this action.

26

Legal Standard

27

While the presumption in litigation is that parties must use their real names, courts permit

28

parties to proceed anonymously when special circumstances justify secrecy. Does I thru XXIII v.
1

1

Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1067 (9th Cir. 2000).1 The Ninth Circuit has held a party may

2

proceed with a pseudonym “in the unusual case when nondisclosure of the party’s identity is

3

necessary…to protect a person from harassment, injury, ridicule or personal embarrassment.” Id. at

4

1067-68 (internal quotation and citation omitted). “[A] party may preserve his or her anonymity in

5

judicial proceedings in special circumstances when the party’s need for anonymity outweighs

6

prejudice to the opposing party and the public's interest in knowing the party’s identity.” Id. at 1068.

7

The decision of whether to allow a party to remain anonymous is within this Court’s discretion. Doe

8

v. Kamehameha Sch., 596 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010). Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

9

5.2(e), for good cause, a court may require redaction of certain personal information from court

10

filings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(e).

11

Discussion

12

Plaintiff requests to proceed by the pseudonym “L.V.Q.” to protect his private health

13

information, “vulnerable immigration status,” and because this action involves allegations of sexual

14

assault. (Doc. 2 at 3).

15

From 2018 through 2022, Plaintiff was held at Mesa Verde Immigrations and Customs

16

Enforcement (“ICE”) Processing Center (“Mesa Verde”) for civil immigration detention. (Doc. 1 at

17

¶¶ 2-3). Mesa Verde is a private immigration detention center owned and operated on behalf of ICE

18

pursuant to a federal contract by Defendant. Id. at ¶¶ 3, 27. Plaintiff claims during his detainment at

19

Mesa Verde, he was a victim of sexual harassment and assault. See id. at ¶¶ 4, 85, 98, 101-09.

20

Plaintiff asserts he is at a “high risk of serious personal embarrassment and emotional injury if he is

21

forced to proceed with his real identity.” (Doc. 2 at 4). Plaintiff also asks for anonymity as his mental

22

and physical health conditions are a principal issue in this case and his private health information will

23

be disclosed. Id. at 5. Separately, Plaintiff requests anonymity due to his pending immigration case,

24

which includes an application for relief under the Convention Against Torture. Id. at 5-6. Plaintiff

25

indicates his identity will be disclosed to Defendant during this litigation. Id. at 4.

26
27
28

This presumption is loosely related to the public’s right to open courts and the right of private
individuals to confront their accusers. Doe v. Kamehameha Sch., 596 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010).
1

2

1

At this stage of the proceedings, the Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff’s request to

2

proceed under pseudonym and to redact Plaintiff’s true name under Rule 5.2(e)(1). The Court finds

3

based on Plaintiff’s allegations and concerns at issue, the need for anonymity in this case outweighs

4

countervailing considerations at this time. “Courts have generally permitted plaintiffs to proceed

5

anonymously when their claims involved allegations of sexual assault or rape.” Doe v. California, No.

6

1:23-cv-00868-JLT-BAM (PC), 2023 WL 3996476, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2023) (citing Doe v.

7

Rose, No. CV-15-07503, 2016 WL 9137645, at *1-2 (C.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2016) (collecting cases)); see

8

A.G. v. Cnty. of Siskiyou, No. 2:24-cv-01375 CKD, 2024 WL 2304851, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 21,

9

2024). Likewise, private health information and immigration status can be a basis to prohibit

10

disclosure of a plaintiff’s true and correct name. Ms. R.H. v. United States, No. 23-cv-05793, 2023

11

WL 7563749, at *1-2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2023) (collecting cases); Doe v. Sessions, No. 18-0004

12

(RC), 2018 WL 4637014, at *4-5 (D.D.C. Sep. 27, 2018). However, the Court will reconsider the

13

issue should Defendant object once it has appeared in this action. See Doe v. California, No. 1:32-cv-

14

00869-JLT-SAB, 2023 WL 3956475, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2023).

15

Conclusion and Order

16

For the foregoing reasons, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:

17

1. Plaintiff’s ex parte motion to proceed under pseudonym and for protective order (Doc. 2) is

18

GRANTED, subject to reconsideration following Defendant’s appearance in this action;

19

2. Defendant shall file an opposition, objection, or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s ex

20
21
22

parte motion, within 14 days of responding to the complaint;
3. The parties shall refer to Plaintiff by the pseudonym L.V.Q. in all filings and public
proceedings; and

23
24

Remainder of This Page Intentionally Left Blank

25
26
27
28
3

1

4. The parties shall redact or otherwise withhold all personally identifying information, including

2

Plaintiff’s true full names, from all public filings, consistent with Federal Rule of Civil

3

Procedure 5.2.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated:

June 5, 2024

___________________

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4