(PC) Mrozek v. Eaton et al
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff's 2 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order, signed by District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff on 1/28/2025. (Deputy Clerk CRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRADLEY JAMES MROZEK,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
PATRICK EATON, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 1:24-cv-00664-KES-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND/OR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
Docs. 2, 15
16
17
18
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42
19
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On June 3, 2024, Plaintiff filed his initial complaint along with a motion requesting a
22
preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order. Docs. 1, 2. On June 17, 2024, the
23
assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to deny plaintiff’s motion.
24
Doc. 15. Plaintiff did not file any objections, and the deadline to do so has passed.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has conducted a de
26
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and
27
recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
1. The findings and recommendations issued on June 17, 2024, Doc. 15, are adopted in full;
and,
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order, Doc. 2,
is DENIED.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 28, 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?