(SS) Rush v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/26/2024. CASE CLOSED. (Maldonado, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
CHRISTINE FATHE RUSH,
Plaintiff,
v.
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
13
14
15
16
17
20
21
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY
REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE
FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND TO
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; ORDER
(ECF No. 16)
Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), through their undersigned counsel of record,
that the above-entitled action shall be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for
further administrative proceedings.
Upon remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an Administrative Law
Judge (ALJ) for a new decision, and instruct the ALJ to re-evaluate the evidence of record. The
parties further request that the Court direct the Clerk of the Court to enter a final judgment in
favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner.
22
23
CIVIL NO. 1:24-cv-00772-EPG
IT IS STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
This stipulation constitutes a remand under the fourth sentence of Section 205(g) of the
Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
///
///
///
///
///
1
1
Dated: November 26, 2024
/s/ Francesco Benavides*
FRANCESCO BENAVIDES
Attorney for Plaintiff
*Authorized via e-mail on November 26, 2024
2
3
4
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
MATHEW W. PILE
Associate General Counsel
Social Security Administration
5
6
7
9
/s/ Erin Jurrens
ERIN JURRENS
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
10
Attorneys for Defendant
8
By:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER1
1
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of
2
3
4
5
6
7
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”), and for cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social
Security for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of Section 205(g) of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an
administrative law judge for a new decision in accordance with the parties’ Stipulation.
The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter a judgment in favor of Plaintiff
8
9
10
11
and against Defendant, and to terminate as moot Plaintiff’s pending motion for summary
judgment. (ECF No. 12).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated:
13
November 26, 2024
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned “for all further proceedings in this action,
including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).” See ECF No. 10.
1
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?