Aguilera v. ISpeedToLead Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to Close Case Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 10/24/2024. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

EMILIANO AGUILERA, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

13
v.
14
15

Case No. 1:24-cv-01021-CDB
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE CASE PURSUANT
TO RULE 41(a)(1) OF THE FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

ISPEEDTOLEAD, INC.,
Defendant.

16

(Doc. 9)
Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

17
18

On August 27, 2024, Plaintiff Emiliano Aguilera (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the

19

filing of a complaint, asserting claims on behalf of himself and a putative class against Defendant

20

ISpeedtoLead, Inc. (Doc. 1). On October 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal

21

of his complaint with prejudice. (Doc. 7). On October 23, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to

22

file an amended notice clarifying the particulars of his voluntary dismissal separately as to his

23

individual claims and the putative class claims. (Doc. 8).

24

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s amended notice of voluntary dismissal with

25

prejudice as to his individual claims and without prejudice as to the putative class claims. (Doc.

26

9).

27
28

Plaintiff’s amended notice of dismissal comports with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(a)(1)(i) and Plaintiff is entitled to dismiss his individual claims (at least) without court order.

1

In a class action, however, court approval of dismissal may be required under Rule 41(a)(2) if the

2

class has been certified. Specifically, Rule 23(e) provides that any claims arising out of either a

3

(1) “certified class” or (2) “class proposed to be certified for purposes of settlement ... may be

4

settled, voluntarily dismissed, or compromised only with the court's approval.” Fed. R. Civ. P.

5

23(e) (emphasis added).

6

In this case, Plaintiff seeks to dismiss the putative class claims under Rule 41(a)(1)

7

without prejudice. (Doc. 9). No class has been certified, Plaintiff has not sought certification, nor

8

has certification been proposed for purposes of settlement. Because no class has been certified in

9

this case, and because any dismissal would not affect putative class members’ claims, Rule 23(e)

10

does not mandate either Court approval of the parties’ settlement or notice to putative class

11

members. See Titus v. BlueChip Financial, 786 Fed. Appx. 694, 695 (9th Cir. 2019) (“Because

12

no class has been certified, Titus is the only plaintiff before the court; once she has dismissed her

13

claims with prejudice, no other plaintiff can step into her shoes to continue this legal action”)

14

(unpublished) (citing Emp’rs-Teamsters Local Nos. 175 & 505 Pension Tr. Fund v. Anchor

15

Capital Advisors, 498 F.3d 920, 924 (9th Cir. 2007)).

16

In light of the Plaintiff’s filing, the Court finds that Rule 23(e) does not require the Court’s

17

approval of the dismissal. This action shall be terminated by operation of law without further

18

order of the Court. Comm. Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077-78

19

(9th Cir. 1999).

20

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to assign a district judge for

21

the purpose of closing this case and then to CLOSE the case and adjust the docket to reflect

22

voluntary dismissal with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(i), as to Plaintiff’s individual claims

23

and without prejudice as to the putative class claims.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated:

October 24, 2024

___________________

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
2