(SS) Bohannan v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER re Unopposed Motion for and Extension of time. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/29/2025. (Deputy Clerk WAK)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE, WSBN 32245 Associate General Counsel Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 Social Security Administration NOAH SCHABACKER, Maryland Bar Special Assistant United States Attorney 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, Maryland 21235 Telephone: (303) 844-6232 E-Mail: Noah.Schabacker@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 SAVANAH BOHANNAN, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 vs. MICHELLE KING, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1 17 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-01152-KES-SKO STIPULATION AND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME; ORDER (Doc. 14) 18 Pending the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the 19 parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to 20 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from January 30, 2025, up to and 21 including March 3, 2025. This is the Defendant’s first request for an extension. 22 This matter was assigned on January 7, 2025. Based on a review of the record, 23 undersigned counsel requires additional time to explore settlement options. Defendant 24 apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay. Undersigned counsel 25 26 27 28 1 Michelle King became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on January 20, 2025. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Michelle King should be substituted for Carolyn Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Stip. for Ext.; 1:24-CV-01152-KES-SKO 1 1 contacted Plaintiff’s counsel on January 28, 2025; he indicated he had no objection to this 2 request. The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified 3 4 accordingly. 5 6 Respectfully submitted, Dated: January 28, 2025 /s/ Justin Prato* (*as authorized via e-mail on January 28, 2025) JUSTIN PRATO Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: January 28, 2025 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE Associate General Counsel Social Security Administration 7 8 9 10 11 12 By: 14 /s/ Noah Schabacker NOAH SCHABACKER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 15 Attorneys for Defendant 13 16 17 ORDER Pursuant to parties’ foregoing stipulation and unopposed motion (Doc. 14), and for good 18 19 cause shown (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4)), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall have up to and 20 including to March 3, 2025, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. All other 21 dates in the Scheduling Order (Doc. 5) are enlarged accordingly. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Sheila K. Oberto January 29, 2025 25 . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 Stip. for Ext.; 1:24-CV-01152-KES-SKO 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?