(SS) Bohannan v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER re Unopposed Motion for and Extension of time. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/29/2025. (Deputy Clerk WAK)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
MATHEW W. PILE, WSBN 32245
Associate General Counsel
Office of Program Litigation, Office 7
Social Security Administration
NOAH SCHABACKER, Maryland Bar
Special Assistant United States Attorney
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Telephone: (303) 844-6232
E-Mail: Noah.Schabacker@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
SAVANAH BOHANNAN,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
MICHELLE KING,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1
17
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:24-cv-01152-KES-SKO
STIPULATION AND UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME;
ORDER
(Doc. 14)
18
Pending the Court’s approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the
19
parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to
20
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from January 30, 2025, up to and
21
including March 3, 2025. This is the Defendant’s first request for an extension.
22
This matter was assigned on January 7, 2025. Based on a review of the record,
23
undersigned counsel requires additional time to explore settlement options. Defendant
24
apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay. Undersigned counsel
25
26
27
28
1
Michelle King became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on January 20, 2025.
Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Michelle King should be
substituted for Carolyn Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to
continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. § 405(g).
Stip. for Ext.; 1:24-CV-01152-KES-SKO
1
1
contacted Plaintiff’s counsel on January 28, 2025; he indicated he had no objection to this
2
request.
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified
3
4
accordingly.
5
6
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: January 28, 2025
/s/ Justin Prato*
(*as authorized via e-mail on January 28, 2025)
JUSTIN PRATO
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: January 28, 2025
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
MATHEW W. PILE
Associate General Counsel
Social Security Administration
7
8
9
10
11
12
By:
14
/s/ Noah Schabacker
NOAH SCHABACKER
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
15
Attorneys for Defendant
13
16
17
ORDER
Pursuant to parties’ foregoing stipulation and unopposed motion (Doc. 14), and for good
18
19
cause shown (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4)), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant shall have up to and
20
including to March 3, 2025, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. All other
21
dates in the Scheduling Order (Doc. 5) are enlarged accordingly.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
January 29, 2025
25
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
Stip. for Ext.; 1:24-CV-01152-KES-SKO
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?