(SS) Crossley v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
16
ORDER DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR A BRIEFING EXTENSION signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/7/2025. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's deadline to file a responsive brief is extended to and included March 14, 2025. (Deputy Clerk YV)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
Case No. 1:24-CV-01218-GSA
CHRISTINE KAY CROSSLEY,
ORDER DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR A
BRIEFING EXTENSION
11
Defendant seeks an unopposed 14-day extension from March 7, 2025 to March 21, 2025
12
to file a responsive brief, citing as cause for the extension: 1- other case deadlines; and 2- a one
13
day absence from the office due to illness. ECF No. 15.
14
This request—though unopposed—is not entirely reasonable. This is Defendant’s second
15
extension request, having been granted a 30-day extension on February 3. ECF No. 14. The
16
request was also filed on the day of the deadline, March 7, 2025. The scheduling order provides
17
that last minute extension request are disfavored. ECF No. 6 at 6 (citing Local Rule 144(d)).
18
Further, the Administrative Record in this matter is comparatively quite short at 546 pages, less
19
than half of which are medical records.
20
The justifications offered for the extension—pre-existing deadlines in other cases and 1
21
day of sick leave—are not compelling justifications for a second extension request filed on the day
22
of the deadline. A shorter extension of 7 days will be granted.
23
24
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s deadline to file a responsive brief is
extended to and included March 14, 2025.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 7, 2025
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
Stip. for Ext.; 1:24-CV-01218-GSA
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. for Ext.; 1:24-CV-01218-GSA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?