Harris v Galactic Co., LLC
Filing
5
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed for Plaintiff's Failure to Prosecute this Action and to Comply with the Court's Orders; ORDER CONTINUING the Mandatory Scheduling Conference; ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to Effect Servic e of this Order and to File Proof of Service signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 01/29/2025. The Scheduling Conference set for 02/03/2025 is CONTINUED to 3/20/2025 at 10:00 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Deputy Clerk CRB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 AMBER S. HARRIS,
Case No. 1:24-cv-01347-CDB
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO
COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14 GALACTIC CO., LLC,
15
Defendant.
ORDER CONTINUING THE
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
16
17
18
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
EFFECT SERVICE OF THIS ORDER AND
TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE
19
FIVE-DAY DEADLINE
20
21
Plaintiff Amber S. Harris (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint
22 on November 4, 2024. (Doc. 1). The same day, the Clerk of the Court issued summons for
23 service upon Defendant Galactic Co., LLC, and the Court entered an order setting a mandatory
24 scheduling conference for February 3, 2025. (Docs. 3-4). The Court’s order directed Plaintiff to
25 “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.”
26 (Doc. 4 at 1). The order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this action
27 “may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants.” Id.
28 To date, Plaintiff has not filed proofs of service nor any report setting forth an explanation for the
1
1 failure, and no Defendant has appeared in the action.
2
Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these
3 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all
4 sanctions…within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control
5 its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including
6 dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000).
7
In addition, Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: “If a defendant
8 is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court - on motion or on its own after
9 notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order
10 that service be made within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Absent a showing of good
11 cause, failure to comply with Rule 4(m) requires dismissal of any unserved defendant.
12 Conclusion and Order
13
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within five (5) days of entry of
14 this order, Plaintiff SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed –
15 including dismissal of any unserved Defendant or this action in its entirety – for Plaintiff’s
16 failure to prosecute, failure to serve the summons and complaint in a timely manner, and failure
17 to promptly file proof of service. Filing summons returned executed following entry of this
18 order WILL NOT relieve Plaintiff of her obligation to respond to this order in writing.
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the scheduling conference previously set for February
20 3, 2025, is CONTINUED to March 20, 2025, at 10:00 a.m.
21
And IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on
22 Defendant within five (5) days of entry of this order and promptly file proof of service thereof.
23
Any failure by Plaintiff to timely respond to this order to show cause will result in
24 the imposition of sanctions, including a recommendation to dismiss this action.
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
January 29, 2025
___________________
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?