Brinich-Barnes v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 18

ORDER DENYING 17 Request for Permission to File Electronically Without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/7/2025. (Deputy Clerk JPX)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HELEN BRINICH-BARNES, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Case No. 1:24-cv-01414-KES-SKO ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. 17) Defendant. _____________________________________/ 17 18 On March 4, 2025, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff Helen Brinich-Barnes 19 (“Plaintiff”), in which she requests permission to file electronically. (Doc. 17.) Local Rule 20 133(b)(2) provides that “[a]ny person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except 21 with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” Instead, “[a]ll parties shall file 22 and serve paper documents as required by applicable Federal Rules of Civil . . . Procedure or by 23 these [Local] Rules.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule 133(b)(2). Nonetheless, a pro se party may “[r]equest 24 to use paper or electronic filing as exceptions from these Rules” if (1) they submit a stipulation 25 between the parties “as provided in [Local Rule] 143;” or (2) “if a stipulation cannot be had,” by 26 a “written motion[] setting out an explanation of reasons for the exception.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule 27 133(b)(3). 28 1 Here, Plaintiff has filed a motion setting forth an explanation of the reasons for the 2 requested exception, specifically that an immediate family member underwent a major medical 3 procedure and is in need of her care in Los Angeles. (Doc. 17.) However, Plaintiff has not 4 demonstrated how her presence in Los Angeles would interfere with her ability to comply with 5 the conventional filing requirement as defined in Local Rule 101, which provides that 6 8 “Conventional Filing” is the filing of a document with the Clerk of Court in paper format. Documents filed conventionally may be filed via mail or in person. Parties that require a conventionally-filed document to be conformed and returned must submit one additional legible conformed copy, and if mailed, a postage paid return envelope. If a postage paid envelope is not received, documents cannot be returned. 9 E.D. Cal. Local Rule 101. Because Plaintiff has not established that she would be unable to submit 10 filings via mail, the Court finds that it would be inappropriate at this time to deviate from the Local 11 Rule that “[a]ny person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule 12 133(b)(2). 7 13 14 Accordingly, the Court DENIES the request (Doc. 17), subject to renewal upon a showing of sufficient reason to justify deviating from Local Rule 133(b)(2). 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: 18 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto March 7, 2025 . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?