Brinich-Barnes v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING 17 Request for Permission to File Electronically Without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/7/2025. (Deputy Clerk JPX)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HELEN BRINICH-BARNES,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
v.
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
Case No. 1:24-cv-01414-KES-SKO
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
PERMISSION TO FILE
ELECTRONICALLY WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
(Doc. 17)
Defendant.
_____________________________________/
17
18
On March 4, 2025, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff Helen Brinich-Barnes
19
(“Plaintiff”), in which she requests permission to file electronically. (Doc. 17.) Local Rule
20
133(b)(2) provides that “[a]ny person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except
21
with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” Instead, “[a]ll parties shall file
22
and serve paper documents as required by applicable Federal Rules of Civil . . . Procedure or by
23
these [Local] Rules.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule 133(b)(2). Nonetheless, a pro se party may “[r]equest
24
to use paper or electronic filing as exceptions from these Rules” if (1) they submit a stipulation
25
between the parties “as provided in [Local Rule] 143;” or (2) “if a stipulation cannot be had,” by
26
a “written motion[] setting out an explanation of reasons for the exception.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule
27
133(b)(3).
28
1
Here, Plaintiff has filed a motion setting forth an explanation of the reasons for the
2
requested exception, specifically that an immediate family member underwent a major medical
3
procedure and is in need of her care in Los Angeles. (Doc. 17.) However, Plaintiff has not
4
demonstrated how her presence in Los Angeles would interfere with her ability to comply with
5
the conventional filing requirement as defined in Local Rule 101, which provides that
6
8
“Conventional Filing” is the filing of a document with the Clerk of Court in paper
format. Documents filed conventionally may be filed via mail or in person. Parties
that require a conventionally-filed document to be conformed and returned must
submit one additional legible conformed copy, and if mailed, a postage paid return
envelope. If a postage paid envelope is not received, documents cannot be returned.
9
E.D. Cal. Local Rule 101. Because Plaintiff has not established that she would be unable to submit
10
filings via mail, the Court finds that it would be inappropriate at this time to deviate from the Local
11
Rule that “[a]ny person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule
12
133(b)(2).
7
13
14
Accordingly, the Court DENIES the request (Doc. 17), subject to renewal upon a showing
of sufficient reason to justify deviating from Local Rule 133(b)(2).
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17 Dated:
18
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
March 7, 2025
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?