(SS) A.J.M v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
9
ORDER directing Clerk of Court to randomly assign District Judge; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending Plaintiff's IFP Application be denied 2 , 7 signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/27/2025. Referred to Judge Jennifer L. Thurston; Objections to F&R due within 14-Days. (Deputy Clerk TEL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
on behalf of A.J.M.,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
Case No. 1:24-cv-01540-BAM
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT
JUDGE
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED
(Docs. 2, 7)
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
19
On December 16, 2024, Plaintiff Nancy Moreno on behalf of minor A.J.M. (“Plaintiff”),
20
through counsel, filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner
21
of the Social Security Administration. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead
22
filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2.) On
23
December 18, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete and file a long form application as
24
Plaintiff’s application was insufficient for the Court to determine if Plaintiff was entitled to
25
proceed without prepayment of fees in the action, noting that Plaintiff indicated that she and her
26
husband received $4,000.00 per month each from employment and that Plaintiff did not identify
27
the amount she contributed to dependents. (Doc. 4.) On January 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a long
28
1
1
form motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 7.)
2
According to Plaintiff’s long form application, she receives monthly income from
3
employment in the amount of $4,000.00 per month and her spouse also receives monthly income
4
from employment in the amount of $4,000.00 per month. (Doc. 7 at 1-2.) This amounts to an
5
annual income of $96,000.00 ($8,000.00 x 12 months). Plaintiff lists two dependents – a 13-year-
6
old daughter and 11-year-old son. (Doc. 7 at 3.) Plaintiff also appears to provide some level of
7
support for her mother. (Id. at 3.)
8
“To satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915, applicants must demonstrate that
9
because of poverty, they cannot meet court costs and still provide themselves, and any
10
dependents, with the necessities of life.” Soldani v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:19-cv-00040,
11
2019 WL 2160380, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2019). Many courts look to the federal poverty
12
guidelines set by the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) as a
13
guidepost in evaluating in forma pauperis applications. See Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc., 364
14
F.3d 1305, 1307 n.5 (11th Cir. 2004); Boulas v. United States Postal Serv., No. 1:18-cv-01163-
15
LJO-BAM, 2018 WL 6615075, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2018) (applying federal poverty
16
guidelines to in forma pauperis application). For a family or household of four, the 2025 poverty
17
guideline is $32,150, while the 2025 poverty guideline is $37,650 for a family or household of
18
five. See U.S. Federal Poverty Guidelines Used to Determine Financial Eligibility for Certain
19
Federal Programs, available at https://aspe.hhs.gov/topics/poverty-economic-mobility/poverty-
20
guidelines (last visited January 24, 2025).
21
Having considered Plaintiff’s application, the Court finds that she has not made the
22
showing required by section 1915 that she is unable to pay the required fees for this action.
23
Plaintiff has attested to household employment income that is more than double the federal
24
poverty guidelines. (Doc. 7.) In light of this, there is no indication that Plaintiff is unable to pay
25
the filing fee while also providing for the necessities of life. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court
26
is HEREBY DIRECTED to randomly assign a District Judge to this action.
27
///
28
///
2
1
Furthermore, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:
2
1.
3
be DENIED; and
4
2.
5
Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs (Docs. 2, 7)
Plaintiff be required to pay the $405.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this
action.
6
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
7
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
8
(14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file written
9
objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
10
Findings and Recommendations.” Objections, if any, shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages or
11
include exhibits. Exhibits may be referenced by document and page number if already in
12
the record before the Court. Any pages filed in excess of the 15-page limit may not be
13
considered. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may
14
result in the waiver of the “right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings” on appeal.
15
Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838–39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d
16
1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
January 27, 2025
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?