(PC) Cole v. California Department of Corrections Rehabilitation et al
Filing
13
ORDER to Submit Signed Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee Within Thirty (30) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/5/2025. Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall re-submit the enclosed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with plaintiff's original signature, or in the alternative, pay the $405.00 filing fee for this action. (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application) (Deputy Clerk OFR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
GEORGE LEE COLE, JR,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
v.
1:25-cv-00272-GSA (PC)
ORDER TO SUBMIT SIGNED APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR
PAY FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY (30)
DAYS
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION et
al,
Defendant.
18
19
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant
20
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28
21
U.S.C. § 1915. However, plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was deficient in
22
that it did not include plaintiff's required original signature. Each document submitted for filing
23
must include the original signature of the filing party or parties. Local Rule 131; F.R.C.P. 11(a).
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall re-submit
26
the enclosed application to proceed in forma pauperis, with plaintiff's original signature, or in the
27
alternative, pay the $405.00 filing fee for this action.
28
1
1
2
Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 5, 2025
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?