Hedrick et al v. Grant

Filing 124

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/28/14 DENYING 123 Motion for Extension. The conclusory motion filed on 2/10/14 is denied since it fails to precisely specify the grounds for the motion, the standard applicable to such motion, and that under the applicable standard the relief sought should be granted. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8
9

DARRIL HEDRICK, DALE ROBINSON,
KATHY LINDSEY, MARTIN C. CANADA,
DARRY TYRONE PARKER, individually
and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

2:76-cv-00162-GEB-EFB
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE

Plaintiffs,
v.
JAMES GRANT, as Sheriff of Yuba
County; Lieutenant FRED J. ASBY,
as Yuba County Jailer; JAMES
PHARRIS, ROY LANDERMAN, DOUG
WALTZ, HAROLD J. “SAM” SPERBECK,
JAMES MARTIN, as members of the
YUBA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
Defendants.

17
18

The conclusory motion filed on February 10, 2014 is

19

denied since it fails to precisely specify the grounds for the

20

motion, the standard applicable to such motion, and that under

21

the applicable standard the relief sought should be granted. See

22

Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1)(B)(“[A] motion must . . . state with

23

particularity

24

February 28, 2014

the

grounds

for

25
26
27
28
1

seeking

the

order.”)Dated: