Hedrick et al v. Grant
Filing
124
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/28/14 DENYING 123 Motion for Extension. The conclusory motion filed on 2/10/14 is denied since it fails to precisely specify the grounds for the motion, the standard applicable to such motion, and that under the applicable standard the relief sought should be granted. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
DARRIL HEDRICK, DALE ROBINSON,
KATHY LINDSEY, MARTIN C. CANADA,
DARRY TYRONE PARKER, individually
and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
2:76-cv-00162-GEB-EFB
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE
Plaintiffs,
v.
JAMES GRANT, as Sheriff of Yuba
County; Lieutenant FRED J. ASBY,
as Yuba County Jailer; JAMES
PHARRIS, ROY LANDERMAN, DOUG
WALTZ, HAROLD J. “SAM” SPERBECK,
JAMES MARTIN, as members of the
YUBA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
Defendants.
17
18
The conclusory motion filed on February 10, 2014 is
19
denied since it fails to precisely specify the grounds for the
20
motion, the standard applicable to such motion, and that under
21
the applicable standard the relief sought should be granted. See
22
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1)(B)(“[A] motion must . . . state with
23
particularity
24
February 28, 2014
the
grounds
for
25
26
27
28
1
seeking
the
order.”)Dated:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?