Hedrick et al v. Grant

Filing 274

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/8/2023 GRANTING 269 Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Second Amended Consent Decree. Final Approval Hearing set for 5/17/2023 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. A joint memorandum of points and authorities in support of final approval shall be filed on or before April 19, 2023. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Second Amended Consent Decree)(Cannarozzi, N)

Download PDF
Case 2:76-cv-00162-EFB Document 274 Filed 03/09/23 Page 1 of 4 1 CARTER C. WHITE – 164149 KING HALL CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC 2 U.C. Davis School of Law One Shields Avenue, Bldg. TB-30 3 Davis, California 95616-8821 Telephone: (530) 752-5440 4 Facsimile: (530) 752-5788 Email: ccwhite@ucdavis.edu 5 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891 6 GAY C. GRUNFELD – 121944 MICHAEL FREEDMAN – 262850 7 ALEXANDER GOURSE – 321631 ROSEN BIEN 8 GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 101 Mission Street, Sixth Floor 9 San Francisco, California 94105-1738 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 10 Facsimile: (415) 433-7104 Email: mbien@rbgg.com ggrunfeld@rbgg.com 11 mfreedman@rbgg.com agourse@rbgg.com 12 CARL L. FESSENDEN – 161494 JOHN R. WHITEFLEET – 213301 PORTER | SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825-6581 Telephone: (916) 929-1481 Facsimile: (916) 927-3706 Email: cfessenden@porterscott.com MICHAEL J. CICCOZZI – 134859 JOSEPH F. LARMOUR – 282496 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL COUNTY OF YUBA 915 8th Street, Suite 111 Marysville, California 95901-5273 Telephone: (530) 749-7565 Facsimile: (530) 729-7513 Email: jlarmour@co.yuba.ca.us Attorneys for Defendants 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 16 17 DERRIL HEDRICK, DALE ROBINSON, KATHY LINDSEY, MARTIN C. CANADA, 18 DARRY TYRONE PARKER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 JAMES GRANT, as Sheriff of Yuba County; 22 Lieutenant FRED J. ASBY, as Yuba County Jailer; JAMES PHARRIS, ROY LANDERMAN, 23 DOUG WALTZ, HAROLD J. “SAM” SPERBEK, JAMES MARTIN, as members of 24 the YUBA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, 25 Defendants. 26 Case No. 2:76-CV-00162-JAM-EFB [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SECOND AMENDED CONSENT DECREE AND EXPEDITING HEARING DATE Judge: Date: Time: Crtrm.: Hon. Edmund F. Brennan March 8, 2023 11:00 a.m. 8, 13th Floor Trial Date: None Set 27 28 [4240085.2] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SECOND AMENDED CONSENT DECREE AND EXPEDITING HEARING DATE Case 2:76-cv-00162-EFB Document 274 Filed 03/09/23 Page 2 of 4 1 The parties’ Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Second Amended Consent 2 Decree and Request for Expedited Hearing (“Joint Motion”) came on for hearing before 3 this Court on March 8, 2023. The Court, having considered the pleadings on the Joint 4 Motion, oral argument on the Joint Motion, and the record in this case, and good cause 5 appearing, now finds, as follows: 6 1. The Court finds that the Second Amended Consent Decree (“SACD”) falls 7 within the range of possible approval and is sufficiently fair to warrant the dissemination 8 of notice to the class members apprising them of the SACD. 9 2. The proposed SACD is the product of arm’s-length, serious, informed and 10 non-collusive negotiations between experienced and knowledgeable counsel who have 11 actively prosecuted and defended this litigation. 12 3. The Court has already certified a class and appointed class counsel and will 13 likely be able to approve the proposed SACD under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of 14 Civil Procedure. 15 4. The SACD is granted preliminary approval and incorporated herein by this 16 reference, and has the full force and effect of an order of the Court. 17 5. A hearing is appropriate to consider whether this Court should grant final 18 approval to the SACD, and to allow adequate time for the members of the class, or their 19 counsel, to support or oppose the SACD. 20 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 21 6. The parties’ request to expedite the hearing on this Joint Motion for 22 Preliminary Approval of Second Amended Consent Decree for March 8, 2023, at 10:00 23 a.m. is granted. 24 7. The Notice of Second Amended Consent Decree (“Notice”), attached hereto, 25 is approved. The Notice constitutes valid, due, and sufficient notice to the class, 26 constitutes the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and complies fully with the 27 requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The proposed forms of 28 Notice apprise class members in a fair and neutral way of the existence of the settlement 1 [4240085.2] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF AMENDED CONSENT DECREE, APPOINTING CO-COUNSEL FOR CLASS AND EXPEDITING HEARING DATE Case 2:76-cv-00162-EFB Document 274 Filed 03/09/23 Page 3 of 4 1 with the Defendants and their rights with respect to the settlement. 2 8. Within three (3) days of this Order, Defendants must post the Notice (1) on 3 the County’s official website (www.co.yuba.ca.us/); and (2) in all Jail facilities operated by 4 Defendants, including, but not limited to, in all dayrooms, all medical clinic spaces, the 5 visiting area, and the intake area in the Yuba County Jail. Copies of the SACD shall be 6 available in the Jail library and made available to class members upon request. 7 9. Dissemination of the Notice as provided above is hereby authorized and 8 approved, and satisfies the notice requirement of Rule 23(e), Federal Rules of Civil 9 Procedure, the Constitution of the United States, due process and any other applicable 10 rule(s) of this Court. No later than ten (10) days after this Order, Defendants must file and 11 serve on Plaintiffs’ counsel an affidavit affirming that they published notice as required in 12 the Court’s order. 10. 13 Any member of the class may write to the Court about whether the 14 settlement is fair. The Court will consider written communications when deciding whether 15 to approve the settlement. Comments must include at the top of the first page the case 16 name, Hedrick v. Grant, E.D. Cal. No. 2:76-cv-00162-JAM-EFB. Comments must be 17 postmarked no later than thirty-six (36) days after the issuance of this Order, and sent to 18 the following address: Clerk of the Court United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 I Street Sacramento, CA 9581 19 20 21 11. 22 A final approval hearing pursuant to Rule 23(e), Federal Rules of Civil 23 Procedure, will be in Courtroom 8 of the undersigned on May 17, 2023 at 11:00 a.m. in the 24 United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, to determine whether the 25 proposed settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate, and whether it should be finally 26 approved by the Court. The hearing may be continued from time to time without further 27 notice. 28 2 [4240085.2] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SECOND AMENDED CONSENT DECREE AND EXPEDITING HEARING DATE Case 2:76-cv-00162-EFB Document 274 Filed 03/09/23 Page 4 of 4 1 12. A joint memorandum of points and authorities in support of final approval 2 shall be filed on or before April 19, 2023. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: March 8, 2023 7 Edmund F. Brennan United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 [4240085.2] [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SECOND AMENDED CONSENT DECREE AND EXPEDITING HEARING DATE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?