Hedrick et al v. Grant

Filing 291

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/19/2024 EXTENDING the deadline to Meet and Confer to 9/1/24. (Woodson, A)

1 CARTER C. WHITE – 164149
KING HALL CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC
2 U.C. Davis School of Law
One Shields Avenue, Bldg. TB-30
3 Davis, California 95616-8821
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
5
MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891
6 GAY CROSTHWAIT GRUNFELD – 121944
MICHAEL FREEDMAN – 262850
7 ALEXANDER GOURSE – 321631
ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
8 101 Mission Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-1738
9 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
10 Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
11
[e-mail]
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

16
17 DERRIL HEDRICK, DALE ROBINSON,
KATHY LINDSEY, MARTIN C. CANADA,
18 DARRY TYRONE PARKER, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
JAMES GRANT, as Sheriff of Yuba County;
22 Lieutenant FRED J. ASBY, as Yuba County
Jailer; JAMES PHARRIS, ROY LANDERMAN,
23 DOUG WALTZ, HAROLD J. “SAM”
SPERBEK, JAMES MARTIN, as members of
24 the YUBA COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS,
25
Defendants.
26
27
28
[4528644.2]

Case No. 2:76-CV-00162-EFB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF
DEADLINE TO MEET AND
CONFER
Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Trial Date:

None Set

1

On September 13, 2023, this Court granted final approval to a Second Amended

2 Consent Decree in the above-captioned matter (“SACD”) covering certain operations of
3 the Yuba County Jail (the “Jail”). See ECF No. 289.
As relevant here, the SACD states “The SACD shall terminate on January 31, 2025,

4

5 unless prior to December 1, 2024, Plaintiffs file a motion to extend the term of the SACD,
6 in which case the SACD shall remain in place until the Court rules on Plaintiffs’ motion.”
7 ECF No. 289-2 at 42.1 The SACD further states that “By no later than August 1, 2024, the
8 parties shall meet and confer regarding whether Defendants are not in substantial
9 compliance with all or part of the SACD,” and that “Prior to the meet and confer, Plaintiffs
10 shall, in writing, provide Defendants with notice of any provisions of the SACD with
11 which Plaintiffs contend Defendants are not in substantial compliance.” Id.
12

In order to give the parties time to review and evaluate the third-party Monitor’s

13 third report on Defendants’ compliance with the SACD, which is in progress but has not
14 yet been issued, the parties wish to extend the August 1, 2024 deadline to meet and confer
15 by one month, to September 1, 2024.
16

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HERBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and

17 between the parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel, as follows:
18 / / /
19 / / /
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27
28

1

All pincites refer to ECF pagination.

[4528644.2]

1

1.

The August 1, 2024 deadline for the parties to “meet and confer regarding

2 whether Defendants are not in substantial compliance with all or part of the SACD,” see
3 ECF No. 289-2 at 42, is extended to September 1, 2024.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

4
5

6 DATED: July 17, 2024

PORTER SCOTT, P.C.

7
8

By: /s/ Carl Fessenden
Carl Fessenden

9

Attorneys for Defendants

10
11 DATED: July 17, 2024
12

ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
By: /s/ Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld
Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld

13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[4528644.2]

2

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED:

3

1.

The August 1, 2024 deadline for the parties to “meet and confer regarding

4 whether Defendants are not in substantial compliance with all or part of the SACD,” see
5 ECF No. 289-2 at 42, is extended to September 1, 2024.
6
7
8 DATED: July 19, 2024
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[4528644.2]

3