In Re: Equity 30 v.

Filing 384

ORDER AMENDING ANGLE DECREE RE: PLACE OF USE OF WATER RIGHTS signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/5/22. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney EDWARD OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney TODD KIM Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division 10 JUDITH E. COLEMAN (Cal. Bar No. 250123) Senior Attorney United States Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Telephone: (202) 514-3553 Email: Judith.Coleman@usdoj.gov 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 6 7 8 9 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 15 CASE NO. 2:80-CV-00583-TLN [In Equity No. 30] THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 16 17 v. 18 H.C. ANGLE, et al., ORDER AMENDING ANGLE DECREE RE: PLACE OF USE OF WATER RIGHTS Defendants. 19 20 21 This matter is before the Court on the Notice of Proposed Order to Amend Angle Decree 22 filed by the plaintiff, United States of America, on August 5, 2022, which proposed amendments to 23 the place of use of certain decreed water rights in the Final Decree entered in the above-captioned 24 case by the Hon. Frank H. Kerrigan of this Court on January 13, 1930 (the Angle Decree or Decree). 25 The proposed amendments reflect annexations of certain properties into the Orland Project. The 26 Water Master for Stony Creek and Tributaries gave notice of the proposed amendments and received 27 no objections. Accordingly, pursuant the Court’s Order of February 11, 2009 (ECF No. 295), the 28  2:80-CV-00683-TLN Order 1 1 United States submitted a proposed order embodying the amendments, which the Court may approve 2 without a hearing. See Order of Feb. 11, 2009, at 17. 3 The Court has reviewed the Proposed Order, the United States’ Notice of Proposed Order to 4 Amend Angle Decree, the Declaration of Jacob Berens, the Declaration of Ray Sahlberg and Project 5 Land Schedule attached thereto, the United States’ Notice of Filing of Report by Water Master for 6 Proposed Annexations to Orland Project (ECF No. 381), the Notice of Water Master Administering 7 Decree Under the Order Dated February 11, 2009 (ECF No. 381-1), and the complete record before 8 the Court on this matter. Being so advised, the Court finds that the proposed amendments to Angle 9 Decree have been submitted in a manner consistent with the Court’s Order dated February 11, 2009 10 (ECF No. 295), that good cause exists for the amendments, and that no hearing is necessary. 11 Accordingly, the Project Land Schedule in Article VIII of the Angle Decree is hereby 12 AMENDED to annex the following lands into the Orland Project: 13 14 Acres 40.12 Location SW¼ NW¼ Sec. 25 T22N R4W 16 37.93 SE¼ NW¼ Sec. 25 T22N R4W 17 40.14 SW¼ NE¼ Sec. 25 T 22N R4W 18 35.75 SE¼ NE¼ Sec. 25 T22N R4W 153.94 3.86 15 19 Name Verboom SN 867 Ferrasci 868 3.86 SW ¼ NE ¼ Sec. 9 T21N R3W Reimers 869 16.88 SE¼ NE¼ Sec. 10 T22N-R4W 29.67 NE¼ SE¼ Sec. 10 T22N-R4W 23 33.76 SE¼ SE¼ Sec. 10 T22N-R4W 24 0.05 SE¼ NW¼ Sec. 11 T22N-R4W 25 9.81 SW¼ NW¼ Sec. 11 T22N-R4W 17.17 NE¼ SW¼ Sec. 11 T22N-R4W 25.54 NE¼ SW¼ Sec. 11 T22N-R4W 20 21 22 26 27 28  2:80-CV-00683-TLN Order 2 Total Acres (cont’d) 38.51 SW¼ SW¼ Sec. 11 T22N-R4W 2 33.60 SE¼ SW¼ Sec. 11 T22N-R4W 3 33.31 NW¼ NW¼ Sec. 14 T22N-R4W 4 30.40 NE¼ NW¼ Sec. 14 T22N-R4W 11.91 SW¼ NW¼ Sec. 14 T22N-R4W 11.86 SE¼ NW¼ Sec. 14 T22N-R4W 12.05 NE¼ NE¼ Sec. 15 T22N-R4W 1 5 6 7 8 304.52 9 10 The number of acres within the Orland Project to which Orland Project water may be 11 delivered in any given irrigation season, including newly annexed lands, will remain capped at 12 21,000 acres, as prescribed in the Angle Decree. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of August, 2022. 15 16 17 18 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  2:80-CV-00683-TLN Order 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?