Pedersen, et al v. Plumas, et al
Filing
119
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/29/2019 ORDERING defendant to submit for NCCHC accreditation on or before 1/2020 and ORDERING plaintiffs' counsel, within 60 days of the date of this order, to send defendant a breakdown of attorneys' fees from 1/1/2018 to date, send defendant a proposal for length of monitoring period for amended consent decree, as described in this order, and send defendant a proposed draft amended consent decree. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PEDERSON, et al.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 89-cv-1659 KJN P
v.
ORDER
COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On May 24, 2019, a further status conference was held in this action. Paul Comiskey and
17
18
Joshua Piovia-Scott appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. R. Craig Settlemire appeared on behalf of
19
defendant. Following the status conference, the undersigned makes the following ORDER:
20
1. On or before January 2020, defendant shall submit for NCCHC accreditation;
21
2. Within 60 days of the date of this order, plaintiffs’ counsel shall:
22
a. send defendant a breakdown of attorneys’ fees from January 1, 2018, to date;
23
b. send defendant a proposal for the length of a monitoring period for an amended
24
consent decree, including what would be encompassed in the monitoring and plaintiffs’ proposed
25
flat attorneys’ fees for the monitoring;
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
2
c. send defendant a proposed draft amended consent decree.
Dated: May 29, 2019
3
4
5
6
7
Ped1659.oah(3)
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?