Pedersen, et al v. Plumas, et al

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/16/15 ORDERING that within fourteen days of the date of this order, defendants shall file a response to plaintiffs request for a status conference, setting forth the status of compliance with the Consent Decree.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WALTER PEDERSEN, et al.,

12
13
14

No. 2: 89-cv-1659 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiffs in this action challenge the conditions at the Plumas County Jail. On April 20,

18

1992, a Consent Decree was entered. On March 18, 2013, the parties amended the Consent

19

Decree.

20

On March 27, 2015, plaintiffs’ counsel filed a request for a status conference. (ECF No.

21

49.) Plaintiffs’ counsel alleges that there has been insufficient progress regarding the rate of

22

compliance with the Consent Decree.

23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date of this order, defendants

24

shall file a response to plaintiffs’ request for a status conference, setting forth the status of

25

compliance with the Consent Decree.

26

Dated: April 16, 2015

27
Ped1659.ord

28
1