Pedersen, et al v. Plumas, et al

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/20/15 ORDERING that a status conference is set for June 25, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., before the undersigned; On or before June 19, 2015, the parties shall file a joint status report containing proposals for how and a timeline to address the alleged deficiencies in mental health care and the law library.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WALTER PEDERSON, et al., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:89-cv-1659 KJN P v. ORDER COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs in this action challenge the conditions at the Plumas County Jail. On April 20, 17 18 1992, a Consent Decree was entered. On March 18, 2013, the parties amended the Consent 19 Decree. 20 On March 27, 2015, plaintiffs filed a request for a status conference. (ECF No. 49.) 21 Plaintiffs allege that there has been insufficient progress regarding the rate of compliance with the 22 Consent Decree. On April 17, 2015, the undersigned ordered defendants to file a response to 23 plaintiff’s request for a status conference. (ECF No. 52.) On May 4, 2015, defendants filed their 24 response. (ECF No. 53.) The pleadings indicate that defendants may not be in compliance with the sections of the 25 26 amended Consent Decree addressing mental health care and the law library. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. A status conference is set for June 25, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., before the undersigned; 3 2. On or before June 19, 2015, the parties shall file a joint status report containing 4 proposals for how and a timeline to address the alleged deficiencies in mental health care and the 5 law library. 6 Dated: May 20, 2015 7 8 9 Ped1659.conf 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?