Pedersen, et al v. Plumas, et al
Filing
89
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/2017 SETTING a Telephonic Status Conference for 5/10/2017 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PEDERSON, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2: 89-cv-1659 KJN P
v.
ORDER
COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Pursuant to the order filed February 8, 2017, the parties were ordered to file a joint status
17
18
report addressing the dental care issues on or before May 1, 2017. (ECF No. 85.)
On May 1, 2017, plaintiffs filed a status report stating that defendants failed to respond to
19
20
their repeated inquiries regarding the status of the dental care issues. (ECF No. 87.) On May 1,
21
2017, defendants filed a status report stating that, due to short staffing in the Plumas County
22
Counsel’s Office, defendants’ counsel has not been in a position to work with plaintiff’s counsel
23
on the issues related to dental care. (ECF No. 88.) However, defendants’ counsel does not
24
address why he failed to timely communicate that fact to plaintiffs’ counsel or the court,
25
otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ counsel, or seek an extension of time from the court.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. A telephonic status conference is set before the undersigned for May 10, 2017, at 10:00
28
a.m.;
1
1
2. At the telephonic status conference, defendants’ counsel shall be prepared to address
2
why sanctions of $500 should not be imposed for his failure to participate in the preparation of
3
the joint status report regarding dental care, or otherwise seek an extension of time of that
4
deadline from the court.
5
Dated: May 3, 2017
6
7
8
9
Ped1659.osc
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?