Pedersen, et al v. Plumas, et al

Filing 89

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/3/2017 SETTING a Telephonic Status Conference for 5/10/2017 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PEDERSON, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. 2: 89-cv-1659 KJN P v. ORDER COUNTY OF PLUMAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Pursuant to the order filed February 8, 2017, the parties were ordered to file a joint status 17 18 report addressing the dental care issues on or before May 1, 2017. (ECF No. 85.) On May 1, 2017, plaintiffs filed a status report stating that defendants failed to respond to 19 20 their repeated inquiries regarding the status of the dental care issues. (ECF No. 87.) On May 1, 21 2017, defendants filed a status report stating that, due to short staffing in the Plumas County 22 Counsel’s Office, defendants’ counsel has not been in a position to work with plaintiff’s counsel 23 on the issues related to dental care. (ECF No. 88.) However, defendants’ counsel does not 24 address why he failed to timely communicate that fact to plaintiffs’ counsel or the court, 25 otherwise respond to plaintiffs’ counsel, or seek an extension of time from the court. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. A telephonic status conference is set before the undersigned for May 10, 2017, at 10:00 28 a.m.; 1 1 2. At the telephonic status conference, defendants’ counsel shall be prepared to address 2 why sanctions of $500 should not be imposed for his failure to participate in the preparation of 3 the joint status report regarding dental care, or otherwise seek an extension of time of that 4 deadline from the court. 5 Dated: May 3, 2017 6 7 8 9 Ped1659.osc 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?