Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 4093

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/3/11. Defendants agree to pay Plaintiffs counsel $418,957.58 within 45 days of the signing of this Order. On the 45th day following the entry of this Order, interest on any unpaid amount will begin to accrue at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891 ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 2 LISA ELLS – 243657 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP 3 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1823 4 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 DONALD SPECTER – 083925 STEVEN FAMA – 099641 PRISON LAW OFFICE 1917 Fifth Street Berkeley, California 94710-1916 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 5 JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN – 099358 EDWARD P. SANGSTER – 121041 6 RAYMOND E. LOUGHREY – 194363 K&L GATES LLP 7 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94111-5994 8 Telephone: (415) 882-8200 WARREN E. GEORGE – 053588 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4067 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 9 CLAUDIA CENTER – 158255 THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY – 10 EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 600 Harrison Street, Suite 120 11 San Francisco, California 94107-1389 Telephone: (415) 864-8848 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 19 20 v. Case No. Civ S 90-0520 LKK_JFM STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARALEGAL AND LITIGATION ASSISTANT RATES FOR 2010 AND THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2011 21 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 [547992-3] STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARALEGAL AND LITIGATION ASSISTANT RATES FOR 2010 AND THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2011 1 On June 28, 2011 the parties stipulated to meet and confer regarding the 2010 2 hourly rate for paralegals and certain other litigation assistants within 30 days after 3 resolution of the parties’ related litigation on this issue in Armstrong v. Brown, C94 2307 4 CW (N.D. Cal.). See Docket No. 4029 ¶¶ 4, 6. On August 8, 2011, the Armstrong Court 5 granted Plaintiffs’ motion to compel compensation at their counsel’s billed 2010 hourly 6 rates (Armstrong Docket No. 1919). 7 In light of the Armstrong Court’s order, Plaintiffs now seek a total of $311,947.33 8 for the four quarters of 2010 and $107,010.25 for the first quarter of 2011. These numbers 9 represent the difference between Plaintiffs’ demanded PLRA-capped hourly rates for 10 paralegal and litigation assistants and the $82.50 per hour Defendants have paid during the 11 pendency of this dispute. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are charts setting forth the fees 12 payable to Plaintiffs for the undisputed hours incurred in these five quarters. 13 WHEREFORE, Defendants agree to pay Plaintiffs’ counsel $418,957.58 within 45 14 days of the signing of this Order. On the 45th day following the entry of this Order, 15 interest on any unpaid amount will begin to accrue at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. 16 § 1961 (i.e., the weekly average 1 year constant maturity Treasury yield for the calendar 17 week preceding the date of the Order). 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 24 25 26 27 28 [547992-3] 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARALEGAL AND LITIGATION ASSISTANT RATES FOR 2010 AND THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2011 1 IT IS SO STIPUL S LATED. 2 ated: Septem mber 22, 20 011 3 Da Respectfully submitted R y d, 4 ROSEN, BI R IEN & GAL LVAN, LLP P 5 7 By: B /s/ Erne Galvan est Ernest G Galvan Attorne for Cole eys eman Plaint tiffs ated: Septem mber 22, 20 011 8 Da OFFICE OF THE ATT O F TORNEY G GENERAL 6 9 By: B /s/ David B Brice, Depu Attorney General uty y Attorne for Cole eys eman Defen ndants 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. 14 ated: Octobe 3, 2011. er 15 Da 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [547992-3] 2 ST TIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARAL N R LEGAL AND L LITIGATION A ASSISTANT R RATES FOR 2 2010 AND THE FIRST QUAR F RTER OF 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?