Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
4093
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/3/11. Defendants agree to pay Plaintiffs counsel $418,957.58 within 45 days of the signing of this Order. On the 45th day following the entry of this Order, interest on any unpaid amount will begin to accrue at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961. (Dillon, M)
1 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891
ERNEST GALVAN – 196065
2 LISA ELLS – 243657
ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP
3 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, California 94104-1823
4 Telephone: (415) 433-6830
DONALD SPECTER – 083925
STEVEN FAMA – 099641
PRISON LAW OFFICE
1917 Fifth Street
Berkeley, California 94710-1916
Telephone: (510) 280-2621
5 JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN – 099358
EDWARD P. SANGSTER – 121041
6 RAYMOND E. LOUGHREY – 194363
K&L GATES LLP
7 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94111-5994
8 Telephone: (415) 882-8200
WARREN E. GEORGE – 053588
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111-4067
Telephone: (415) 393-2000
9 CLAUDIA CENTER – 158255
THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY –
10 EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER
600 Harrison Street, Suite 120
11 San Francisco, California 94107-1389
Telephone: (415) 864-8848
12
13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18 RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
19
20
v.
Case No. Civ S 90-0520 LKK_JFM
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
PARALEGAL AND LITIGATION
ASSISTANT RATES FOR 2010 AND THE
FIRST QUARTER OF 2011
21 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
[547992-3]
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARALEGAL AND LITIGATION ASSISTANT RATES FOR 2010 AND THE
FIRST QUARTER OF 2011
1
On June 28, 2011 the parties stipulated to meet and confer regarding the 2010
2 hourly rate for paralegals and certain other litigation assistants within 30 days after
3 resolution of the parties’ related litigation on this issue in Armstrong v. Brown, C94 2307
4 CW (N.D. Cal.). See Docket No. 4029 ¶¶ 4, 6. On August 8, 2011, the Armstrong Court
5 granted Plaintiffs’ motion to compel compensation at their counsel’s billed 2010 hourly
6 rates (Armstrong Docket No. 1919).
7
In light of the Armstrong Court’s order, Plaintiffs now seek a total of $311,947.33
8 for the four quarters of 2010 and $107,010.25 for the first quarter of 2011. These numbers
9 represent the difference between Plaintiffs’ demanded PLRA-capped hourly rates for
10 paralegal and litigation assistants and the $82.50 per hour Defendants have paid during the
11 pendency of this dispute. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are charts setting forth the fees
12 payable to Plaintiffs for the undisputed hours incurred in these five quarters.
13
WHEREFORE, Defendants agree to pay Plaintiffs’ counsel $418,957.58 within 45
14 days of the signing of this Order. On the 45th day following the entry of this Order,
15 interest on any unpaid amount will begin to accrue at the rate provided by 28 U.S.C.
16 § 1961 (i.e., the weekly average 1 year constant maturity Treasury yield for the calendar
17 week preceding the date of the Order).
18 / / /
19 / / /
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23
24
25
26
27
28
[547992-3]
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARALEGAL AND LITIGATION ASSISTANT RATES FOR 2010 AND THE
FIRST QUARTER OF 2011
1
IT IS SO STIPUL
S
LATED.
2
ated: Septem
mber 22, 20
011
3 Da
Respectfully submitted
R
y
d,
4
ROSEN, BI
R
IEN & GAL
LVAN, LLP
P
5
7
By:
B /s/ Erne Galvan
est
Ernest G
Galvan
Attorne for Cole
eys
eman Plaint
tiffs
ated: Septem
mber 22, 20
011
8 Da
OFFICE OF THE ATT
O
F
TORNEY G
GENERAL
6
9
By:
B /s/
David B
Brice, Depu Attorney General
uty
y
Attorne for Cole
eys
eman Defen
ndants
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
14
ated: Octobe 3, 2011.
er
15 Da
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[547992-3]
2
ST
TIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARAL
N
R
LEGAL AND L
LITIGATION A
ASSISTANT R
RATES FOR 2
2010 AND THE
FIRST QUAR
F
RTER OF 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?