Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 4120

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/16/2011 ORDERING 4116 that the state licensing requirements shall be waived, on a temporary and emergency basis, with the respect to the 110 temporary Intermediate Care Facility beds a nd three observation and restraint rooms in the L-Wing at CA Medical Facility: Defendants shall staff the L-Wing utilizing the same nursing and clinical staffing patterns as the other high custody ICF unit at CMF. Defendants shall apprise the Court p romptly should any delays prevent the L-Wing conversion from being completed as to L-3 by 4/6/2012, as to L-2 by 4/30/2012, and as to L-1 by 5/31/2012. Defendants are further required to apprise the Court promptly should patient admissions not commence by 4/30/2012.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 DONALD SPECTER – 083925 STEVEN FAMA – 099641 2 PRISON LAW OFFICE 1917 Fifth Street 3 Berkeley, California 94710-1916 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 4 5 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891 ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 JANE E. KAHN – 112239 LISA ELLS – 243657 AARON J. FISCHER – 247391 LAURA BOYSEN-ARAGON – 248083 ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1823 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 6 CLAUDIA CENTER – 158255 7 THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY – EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 8 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, California 94104-4244 9 Telephone: (415) 864-8848 WARREN E. GEORGE – 053588 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111-4066 Telephone: (415) 393-2000 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 Case No. Civ S 90-0520 LKK-JFM STIPULATION AND ORDER WAIVING STATE LAW RE: CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY 17 EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants.1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 The names of Defendants currently serving and their official capacities have been substituted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25. 28 [567899-3] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WAIVING STATE LAW RE: CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY 1 On November 9, 2011, Defendants filed an ex parte request that this Court waive 2 state licensing requirements so that the California Department of Corrections and 3 Rehabilitation can convert 113 cells in the L-Wing at California Medical Facility into 110 4 temporary unlicensed Intermediate Care Facility level of care beds and three observation 5 and restraint rooms for high custody inmate-patients on the Salinas Valley Psychiatric 6 Program wait list. 7 The Court recognizes that it has not previously permitted Defendants to operate a 8 DMH inpatient care facility on an unlicensed basis. The Court further recognizes, 9 however, that given the urgent need by class members for access to timely inpatient 10 psychiatric care, state licensing requirements must temporarily give way on an emergency 11 basis. 12 Accordingly, Defendants will be permitted to convert and open the L-Wing 13 inpatient beds without complying with state licensing standards on an emergency, 14 temporary basis, on the expedited schedule outlined by Defendants at page 7 of their 15 October 18, 2011 Supplemental Plan to Reduce or Eliminate the Inpatient Waitlists 16 (Docket No. 4103). To the extent that any delays in complying with their proposed 17 conversion timeline are discovered, Defendants will be required to promptly notify the 18 parties, the Special Master, and the Court. Defendants are further ordered to staff the L19 Wing at the same nursing and clinical staffing levels as the other high custody ICF at 20 CMF, as they propose. Id.; Defendants’ Request for Waiver of State Licensing 21 Requirements Re: California Medical Facility (Docket No. 4112) at n.1. Finally, the 22 waivers of state law ordered herein are necessary until the 432 high custody ICF beds 23 planned as part of the California Health Care Facility in Stockton are fully occupied. See 24 Defendants’ Response re: New Activation Schedule for the Consolidated Care Center 25 (Docket No. 3794–1) at 4. 26 Furthermore, the Special Master has been consulted on this matter and he concurs 27 on this stipulation. 28 / / / [567899-3] 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WAIVING STATE LAW RE: CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY 1 Good cause presented to the Court and good cause appearing, the Court waives the 2 below described licensing requirements so that the California Department of Corrections 3 and Rehabilitation can convert the 113 cells in the L-Wing at California Medical Facility 4 into 110 temporary unlicensed Intermediate Care Facility beds and three observation and 5 restraint rooms. 6 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 7 1. The following state licensing requirements shall be waived, on a temporary 8 and emergency basis, with the respect to the 110 temporary Intermediate Care Facility 9 beds and three observation and restraint rooms in the L-Wing at California Medical 10 Facility: 11 A. California Health and Safety Code section 1250(j); and 12 B. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, sections 79501–79861. 13 2. Defendants shall staff the L-Wing utilizing the same nursing and clinical 14 staffing patterns as the other high custody ICF unit at CMF. 15 3. Defendants shall apprise the Court promptly should any delays prevent the 16 L-Wing conversion from being completed as to L-3 by April 6, 2012, as to L-2 by April 17 30, 2012, and as to L-1 by May 31, 2012. Defendants are further required to apprise the 18 Court promptly should patient admissions not commence by April 30, 2012. 19 DATED: November 15, 2011 20 21 22 DATED: November 15, 2011 23 24 25 /s/ David Brice David Brice Office of the Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants /s/ Aaron J. Fischer Aaron J. Fischer Rosen, Bien & Galvan, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: November 16, 2011 27 28 [567899-3] 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WAIVING STATE LAW RE: CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?