Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
4371
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/7/2013 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for an order directing defendants to produce copies of UOF videos to plaintiffs' expert for his review in Washington State is DENIED; defendants s hall forthwith make all responsive UOF videos available to plaintiffs' expert at a date, time, and CDCR location selected by plaintiffs and their expert, and to make those UOF videos available to plaintiff's expert at the selected location for as long as plaintiffs' expert deems necessary to complete his review thereof. (cc: DAD)(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
11
vs.
12
13
No. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
On March 6, 2013, the parties filed a Joint Statement Seeking Clarification of the
16
17
court’s order of March 5, 2013. (Doc. No. 4370 - Joint Statement.) Plaintiffs seek clarification
18
of that part of this court’s March 5, 2013 order (Doc. No. 4367) which required defendants to
19
produce use of force videos (UOF videos) to plaintiff’s expert “in the same manner and to the
20
same extent those . . . materials were provided to defendant’s expert . . . .” (Doc. No. 4367 at 6.)
21
Plaintiffs seek production of copies of the videos in question to their expert in Washington State,
22
where he lives and is currently working on his expert report. (Joint Statement at 1.) Defendants
23
oppose that request and have presented evidence that their expert was not provided copies of
24
UOF videos and did not remove those that he reviewed from CDCR premises. (Joint Statement
25
at 2) (citing Ex. 1 to Decl. of William Downer, filed March 6, 2013 (Doc. 4370-2)). Defendants
26
/////
1
1
also represent that they have agreed to make the UOF videos available for inspection by
2
plaintiffs’ expert at a “mutually agreed upon CDCR facility.” (Joint Statement at 2.)
After review of the parties’ Joint Statement, and good cause appearing, IT IS
3
4
HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for an order directing defendants to produce copies
5
of UOF videos to plaintiffs’ expert for his review in Washington State is denied. Defendants
6
shall forthwith make all responsive UOF videos available to plaintiffs’ expert at a date, time, and
7
CDCR location selected by plaintiffs and their expert, and to make those UOF videos available to
8
plaintiff’s expert at the selected location for as long as plaintiffs’ expert deems necessary to
9
complete his review thereof.
10
DATED: March 7, 2013.
11
12
13
14
15
12
termination.disc5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?