Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 4771

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/26/13 ORDERING that the application is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may submit their Reply not to exceed a total of 23 pages. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 DONALD SPECTER – 083925 STEVEN FAMA – 099641 2 PRISON LAW OFFICE 1917 Fifth Street 3 Berkeley, California 94710-1916 Telephone: (510) 280-2621 4 5 6 7 8 JON MICHAELSON – 083815 JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN – 099358 9 LINDA L. USOZ – 133749 MEGAN CESARE-EASTMAN – 253845 10 RANJINI ACHARYA – 290877 K&L GATES LLP 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 11 San Francisco, California 94111-5994 Telephone: (415) 882-8200 12 MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891 JANE E. KAHN – 112239 ERNEST GALVAN – 196065 THOMAS NOLAN – 169692 LORI E. RIFKIN – 244081 AARON J. FISCHER – 247391 MARGOT MENDELSON – 268583 KRISTA STONE-MANISTA – 269083 ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP 315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor San Francisco, California 94104-1823 Telephone: (415) 433-6830 CLAUDIA CENTER – 158255 THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY – EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, California 94104-4244 Telephone: (415) 864-8848 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 19 20 v. 21 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., 22 Defendants. Case No. Civ S 90-0520 LKK-JFM ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF COURT ORDERS AND AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF RELATED TO USE OF FORCE AND DISCIPLINARY MEASURES 23 24 25 Judge: Date: Time: Crtrm: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton September 26, 2013 10:00 a.m. 4 26 27 28 923033-1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLS.’ APP. TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY ISO MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF COURT ORDERS & AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF RELATED TO USE OF FORCE & DISCIPLINARY MEASURES 1 Proof of good cause having been made to the satisfaction of this Court that 2 Plaintiffs’ application to exceed the page limit for their Reply in Support of Motion for 3 Enforcement of Court Orders and Affirmative Relief Related to Use of Force and 4 Disciplinary Measures should be granted. 5 IT IS ORDERED that the application is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may submit their 6 Reply not to exceed a total of 23 pages. 7 8 DATED: August 26, 2013 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 923033-1 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLS.’ APP. TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY ISO MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF COURT ORDERS & AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF RELATED TO USE OF FORCE & DISCIPLINARY MEASURES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?