Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
4771
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/26/13 ORDERING that the application is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may submit their Reply not to exceed a total of 23 pages. (Kastilahn, A)
1 DONALD SPECTER – 083925
STEVEN FAMA – 099641
2 PRISON LAW OFFICE
1917 Fifth Street
3 Berkeley, California 94710-1916
Telephone: (510) 280-2621
4
5
6
7
8 JON MICHAELSON – 083815
JEFFREY L. BORNSTEIN – 099358
9 LINDA L. USOZ – 133749
MEGAN CESARE-EASTMAN – 253845
10 RANJINI ACHARYA – 290877
K&L GATES LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
11 San Francisco, California 94111-5994
Telephone: (415) 882-8200
12
MICHAEL W. BIEN – 096891
JANE E. KAHN – 112239
ERNEST GALVAN – 196065
THOMAS NOLAN – 169692
LORI E. RIFKIN – 244081
AARON J. FISCHER – 247391
MARGOT MENDELSON – 268583
KRISTA STONE-MANISTA – 269083
ROSEN BIEN
GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
315 Montgomery Street, Tenth Floor
San Francisco, California 94104-1823
Telephone: (415) 433-6830
CLAUDIA CENTER – 158255
THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY –
EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, California 94104-4244
Telephone: (415) 864-8848
13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18 RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
19
20
v.
21 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
22
Defendants.
Case No. Civ S 90-0520 LKK-JFM
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’
APPLICATION TO EXCEED PAGE
LIMIT FOR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF
COURT ORDERS AND
AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF RELATED
TO USE OF FORCE AND
DISCIPLINARY MEASURES
23
24
25
Judge:
Date:
Time:
Crtrm:
Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton
September 26, 2013
10:00 a.m.
4
26
27
28
923033-1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLS.’ APP. TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY ISO MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF
COURT ORDERS & AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF RELATED TO USE OF FORCE & DISCIPLINARY MEASURES
1
Proof of good cause having been made to the satisfaction of this Court that
2 Plaintiffs’ application to exceed the page limit for their Reply in Support of Motion for
3 Enforcement of Court Orders and Affirmative Relief Related to Use of Force and
4 Disciplinary Measures should be granted.
5
IT IS ORDERED that the application is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may submit their
6 Reply not to exceed a total of 23 pages.
7
8 DATED: August 26, 2013
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
923033-1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLS.’ APP. TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY ISO MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF
COURT ORDERS & AFFIRMATIVE RELIEF RELATED TO USE OF FORCE & DISCIPLINARY MEASURES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?