Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 4801

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/13/2013 ORDERING 4726 The deposition of Ellen Bachman shall proceed on 9/20/2013 and shall not exceed four hours. Pursuant to plaintiffs' stipulation, plaintiffs' expert Eldon Vail shall revi ew the custody records that were the subject of plaintiffs' 9/6/2013 motion to compel for purposes of rebuttal testimony only; and The evidentiary hearing on plaintiffs' motion concerning access to inpatient care for death row inmates and use of force will commence as scheduled on 9/26/2013 at 9:15 AM. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Pursuant to court order, the parties have filed a joint statement setting forth their 16 17 schedule for completion of depositions prior to the start of the upcoming evidentiary hearings. 18 The parties have also included their respective positions on whether the start of the first hearing 19 should be continued. After review of the joint statement and good cause appearing, IT IS 20 HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The deposition of Ellen Bachman shall proceed on September 20, 2013 and 21 22 shall not exceed four hours. 2. Pursuant to plaintiffs’ stipulation, plaintiffs’ expert Eldon Vail shall review the 23 24 custody records that were the subject of plaintiffs’ September 6, 2013 motion to compel for 25 purposes of rebuttal testimony only; and 26 ///// 1 3. The evidentiary hearing on plaintiffs’ motion concerning access to inpatient 1 2 care for death row inmates and use of force will commence as scheduled on September 26, 2013 3 at 9:15 a.m. 4 DATED: September 13, 2013. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?