Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
4864
ORDER TO CLARIFY signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/8/2013 re 4860 Order, The court hereby CLARIFIES this order as follows: the word proceedings refers solely to the hearings on the use of force and disciplinary measures against the plaintiff class which commenced in this court on October 1, 2013 and are expected to conclude in mid-October 2013. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
12
13
14
15
No. CIV. S-90-520 LKK/DAD (PC)
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The court’s order herein, dated October 7, 2013, provided in
pertinent part:
Any names, identification numbers, and other
personally-identifying information of any
inmate and any peace officer or other
employee of the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation who may appear
in any video shown during the evidentiary
hearing is irrelevant to these proceedings
and will not be admitted into evidence for
any purpose. Any such personal information
inadvertently shown during the playing of
these tapes is STRICKEN from the record of
these proceedings, and for that reason may
not be disclosed by members of the press or
the public in attendance upon penalty of
contempt
of
court.
This
order
has
no
application to information obtained by the
1
1
press or public independently
proceedings. (ECF No. 4860)
of
these
2
3
The court hereby CLARIFIES this order as follows: the word
4
“proceedings” refers solely to the hearings on the use of force
5
and disciplinary measures against the plaintiff class which
6
commenced in this court on October 1, 2013 and are expected to
7
conclude in mid-October 2013.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
DATED:
October 8, 2013.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?