Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
4930
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/14/13. The court has ordered a reply to the Plaintiffs' MOTION concerning nonretained witnesses. Except as to that MOTION, the court now DECLINES all other MOTIONS IN LIMINE, essentially for the reasons set forth in the relevant opposition to those Motions. One additional comment may be appropriate as to the motion concerning attorney witnesses. That rule is embodied in California's Rule of Professional Conduct 5-210, which has been adopted as this Court's standard of practice for attorneys practicing in this Court. See Local Rule 180(e). That rule specifically limits its applicability to jury trials.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
12
13
14
No. CIV. S-90-520 LKK/DAD (PC)
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
The court is in receipt of the parties motions in limine
18
concerning evidence sought to be introduced in the coming
19
evidentiary hearing relative to the treatment of the mentally ill
20
in ad seg.
21
motion concerning nonretained witnesses.
22
motion, the court now denies all other motions in limine,
23
essentially for the reasons set forth in the relevant opposition
24
to those motions.
25
The court has ordered a reply to the plaintiffs’
Except as to that
One additional comment may be appropriate as to the motion
26
concerning attorney witnesses.
That rule is embodied in
27
California’s Rule of Professional Conduct 5-210, which has been
28
adopted as this court’s standard of practice for attorneys
1
1
practicing in this court.
2
specifically limits its applicability to jury trials.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED:
See Local Rule 180(e).
November 14, 2013.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
That rule
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?