Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al

Filing 5094

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/4/14: After review of the papers filed in support of and opposition to the 4984 Motion, the court will direct the parties to be prepared at the time of the March 10, 2014 status confer ence to address issues related to bed planning, including but not limited to updates, if any, to the projects addressed in defendants' motion and the steps necessary to development and implementation of an adequate process for forecasting and planning for sufficient bed and treatment space for the mentally ill inmate population going forward. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,

12
13
14

No. CIV. S-90-520 LKK/DAD (PC)

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER

EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Pursuant to order filed January 30, 2014 (ECF No. 5034),

18

this matter is set for status conference on Monday, March 10,

19

2014 at 1:30 p.m. to address issues arising from the September 7,

20

2013 death of a class member.

21

On January 21, 2014, defendants filed a motion regarding

22

their long-range mental health bed plan (ECF No. 4984).

On

23

February 5, 2014, plaintiffs filed a response to defendants’

24

motion and a request for further orders (ECF No. 5052), and on

25

February 25, 2014, defendants filed a corrected reply (ECF No.

26

5090-1).

27

opposition to the motion, the court will direct the parties to be

28

prepared at the time of the March 10, 2014 status conference to

After review of the papers filed in support of and

1

1

address issues related to bed planning, including but not limited

2

to updates, if any, to the projects addressed in defendants’

3

motion and the steps necessary to development and implementation

4

of an adequate process for forecasting and planning for

5

sufficient bed and treatment space for the mentally ill inmate

6

population going forward.1

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

DATED:

March 4, 2014.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1

28

The expanded status conference is not intended as oral argument
on defendants’ motion or plaintiffs’ request for court orders.
2