Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Filing
5171
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/18/2014. Defendants shall revisit and, as appropriate, revise their existing mental health staffing plan in order to resolve ongoing problem of mental health staffing shortages and come into compliance w ith requirements of Courts 6/13/2002 1383 Order concerning maximum mental health staff vacancy. Defendants shall assume primary responsibility for completion of this task, with Special Master's participation in accordance with this Order. De fendants shall report to Court on the results of this review on or before 9/12/2014. Defendants have satisfied requirements of paragraph 4 of Court's 3/18/2014 5116 Order. Defendants shall continue to work with their consultant and Special Master to forecast and plan for adequate bed and treatment space for mentally ill population consistent with their current process. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RALPH COLEMAN, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. CIV. S-90-520 LKK/DAD (PC)
v.
ORDER
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
By order filed March 18, 2014, defendants were, inter alia,
18
granted an extension of time to fully activate all mental health
19
units at the California Health Care Facility, ordered to file
20
monthly updates with the court and the Special Master until all
21
units were activated, and, in the first monthly report, include
22
the results of their review of whether the current salary
23
schedule for prison psychiatrists is competitive both within
24
California and nationally.
25
12.
26
court by June 13, 2014 whether their revised mental health bed
27
plan is sufficient to meet the bed needs of the mental health
28
population projected through December 2016 by the Spring 2014
Mar. 18, 2014 Order (ECF No. 5116) at
In the same order, defendants were directed to report to the
1
1
2
population projections.
Id.
The court has received and reviewed the monthly status
3
reports filed to date (ECF Nos. 5123 and 5155), and defendants’
4
June 13, 2014 report concerning whether they have sufficient
5
mental health beds through December 2016 (ECF No. 5169).
6
court has also conferred with the Special Master concerning these
7
reports.
8
9
The
The reports are somewhat encouraging in that it appears
defendants have mental health beds sufficient to meet the
10
projected need through December 2016.
11
and the Special Master confirms, that defendants continue to
12
struggle with the task of hiring sufficient mental health staff,
13
particularly psychiatrists.
14
adequate staff to meet the treatment needs of the identified
15
population would leave defendants short of meeting their
16
constitutional obligations to the plaintiff class.
17
However, it also appears,
A sufficient number of beds without
In 2002, defendants were ordered to maintain a vacancy rate
18
among psychiatrists and case managers of no more than ten
19
percent.
20
ago, defendants were ordered to “continue to take all steps
21
necessary to resolve all outstanding staffing allocation issues,”
22
including development of a staffing plan.
23
(ECF No. 3613) at 2.
24
order, defendants report that their prison psychiatrist salaries
25
“are within the range of comparable private and public sector
26
salaries for psychiatrists within California and nationally” and
27
they have the authority to “offer newly hired psychiatrists
28
salaries in excess of the minimum starting salary in the State
June 13, 2002 Order (ECF No. 1383) at 4.
Five years
June 18, 2009 Order
In response to the court’s March 18, 2014
2
1
pay scale range.”
2
(ECF No. 5123) at 3.
Defs. Status Report and Req. Modify Bed Plan
3
The ongoing difficulties with staffing even with a
4
competitive salary structure suggest, and the Special Master
5
confirms, that it is necessary to revisit and, as appropriate,
6
revise the existing staffing plan in order to resolve the
7
continuing problem of mental health staffing shortages and ensure
8
that defendants come into compliance with the requirements of the
9
June 13, 2002 order concerning maximum mental health staff
10
vacancy rates.
11
for this task, with the Special Master providing guidance and
12
expertise where necessary, to ensure its timely completion, and
13
to ensure that plaintiffs are provided notice and an opportunity
14
for input as appropriate.
15
Defendants shall assume primary responsibility
The March 18, 2014 order also required defendants to
16
“develop a process for forecasting and planning for adequate bed
17
and treatment space for the mentally ill population going
18
forward.”
19
June 13, 2014 Response to that order, defendants represent that
20
“they remain committed to continue to work with their consultant
21
and the Special Master to forecast need to ensure there are
22
adequate beds and treatment space for all Coleman class members.”
23
Defs. Resp. to March 18, 2014 Order (ECF No. 5169) at 4.
24
Special Master informs the court that this representation
25
combined with defendants’ current process for forecasting and
26
planning for mental health bed and treatment space satisfies the
27
requirements of paragraph 4 of the March 18, 2014 order (ECF No.
28
5116).
Mar. 18, 2014 Order (ECF No. 5116) at 12-13.
3
In their
The
1
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Defendants shall revisit and, as appropriate, revise
3
their existing mental health staffing plan in order to resolve
4
the ongoing problem of mental health staffing shortages and come
5
into compliance with the requirements of this court’s June 13,
6
2002 order (ECF No. 1383) concerning maximum mental health staff
7
vacancy.
8
completion of this task, with the Special Master’s participation
9
in accordance with this order.
Defendants shall assume primary responsibility for
Defendants shall report to the
10
court on the results of this review on or before September 12,
11
2014.
12
2.
Defendants have satisfied the requirements of paragraph
13
4 of the court’s March 18, 2014 order (ECF No. 5116).
14
shall continue to work with their consultant and the Special
15
Master to forecast and plan for adequate bed and treatment space
16
for the mentally ill population consistent with their current
17
process.
18
DATED:
June 18, 2014.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Defendants
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?